Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:32:02.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indian English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

Extract

Kachru (1965, 1966) has presented a detailed analysis of the idiosyncratic vocabulary items of Indian English (hereafter IE). He observes that “in India an idiom of English has developed which is Indian in the sense that there are formal and contextual exponents of Indianness in such writing, and the defining-context of such idiom is Indian setting” (1965:396). To illustrate how IE has become culture bound in India, he mentions many formations, such as confusion of caste, dung wash, saltgiver, rape-sister, etc., drawn from IE fiction, and calls them Indianisms.

Type
Lexicon
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Daswani, C.J. 1978. ‘Some Theoretical Implications for Investigating Indian English’, in R., Mohan (ed.) Indian Writing in English, Orient Longman, New Delhi. pp. 115–28.Google Scholar
Kachru, B.B. 1965. ‘The Indianness in Indian English’ in Word Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 391410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B.B. 1966. ‘Indian English: A Study in Contextualisation’, in C.E., Bazell, J.C., Catford, M.A.K., Halliday, and R.H., Robins (ed.) In Memory of J.R. Firth, Longmans, London. pp. 255–87.Google Scholar
Nihalani, P., Tongue, R.K., and Hosali, P. 1979. Indian and British English: A Handbook of Usage and Pronunciation, Oxford University Press, Delhi.Google Scholar
Verma, S.K. 1973. ‘The Systemicness of Indian English’, in ITL, Vol. 22. pp. 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar