Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T20:43:38.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identity formation of Filipino ESL teachers teaching Korean students in the Philippines

How negative and positive identities shape ELT in the Outer Circle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2015

Hohsung Choe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the recent trends in Korean English Language Teaching (ELT) is that Korean parents are sending their children to countries in which English is a second language (ESL). Among these countries, the Philippines is the most preferred country due to its low tuition costs, low cost of living, and a population of well-educated ESL teachers. Every year, approximately 30,000 Korean students study in universities, elementary and secondary schools, and language academies in the Philippines. 10% of this student population consists of student visa holders and 90% are Special Study Permit (SSP) holders. SSPs are issued to international students studying non-degree special courses for a period not exceeding one year, and 90% of Korean students are presumed to enroll on short-term intensive English programs. The exodus of Koreans to the Philippines to learn English is being led by private language academies, which are founded and run by Koreans, solely targeting Korean students. In 2011, the number of such private language academies was estimated to be 280 (Kim, 2011). Furthermore, it was reported that Korean students were spending over 425 million US dollars annually in the Philippines (KEDI, 2012).

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 5 - 11
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amin, N. 2000. ‘Negotiating nativism: Minority immigrant women ESL teachers and the native speaker construct.’ Unpublished PhD dissertation. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Bautista, M. L. S. 2001. ‘Studies of Philippine English: Implications for English language teaching in the Philippines.’ Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 2(2), 271–95.Google Scholar
Braine, G. 2010. Nonnative Speaker English Teachers: Research, Pedagogy, and Professional Growth. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukor, E. 2011. ‘Exploring teacher identity: Teachers’ transformative experiences of re-constructing and re-connecting personal and professional selves.’ Unpublished PhD dissertation. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Dayag, D. T. 2012. ‘Philippine English.’ In Low, E-L. & Hashim, A. (eds.), English in Southeast Asia: Features, Policy and Language in Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, A. 2009. ‘English as a lingua franca, “non-native speakers” and cosmopolitan realities.’ In Sharifian, F. (ed.), English as an International Language: Perspectives and Pedagogical Issues. London: Multilingual Matters, pp. 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, M. 2011. ‘70% of Korean ESL academies in the Philippines have no license.’ Joongang-Ilbo, January, 17, 24.Google Scholar
Korean Educational Development Institute (KEDI). 2012. ‘Brief statistics on Korean education: The year 2011.’ Online at <http://kess.kedi.re.kr/index> (Accessed May 8, 2014).+(Accessed+May+8,+2014).>Google Scholar
Mawhinney, H. & Xu, F. 1997. ‘Reconstructing the professional identity of foreign-trained teachers in Ontario schools.’ TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 632–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otanes, F. T. 1988. ‘The state of English language teaching in the educational system today.’ In Gonzalez, A. B. (ed.), The Role of English and Its Maintenance in the Philippines. Manila: Solidaridad Publishing House, pp. 81–6.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stake, R. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Strother, J. 2015. ‘Koreans get more bang for buck learning English in Philippines.’ Online at <http://blogs.wsj.com/korearealtime/2015/02/27> (Accessed February 28, 2015).+(Accessed+February+28,+2015).>Google Scholar
Tayao, M. L. G. 2004. ‘Philippine English: Phonology.’ In Mesthrie, R. (ed.), A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool, Vol. V.: Africa, South and Southeast Asia. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1047–61.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1999. ‘Voices from the periphery: Non-native teachers and issues of credibility.’ In Braine, G. (ed.), Non-Native Educators in English Language Teaching. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 5–14.Google Scholar