Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:23:03.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

English in Malaysia: a case of the past that never really went away?

English language learning in former British colonies – in this case, Malaysia – may still be influenced by the negative attitudes towards the stereotyped image English has in these countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2013

Extract

The English language has been part of Malaysia for a long time, going back to the beginning of British colonial rule in the 18th century. The present attitudes towards English can be said to vary from conservative (e.g. referring to it as bahasa penjajah, literally ‘language of the coloniser’) to general acceptance (e.g. English is part of Malaysian history) and to a liberal/modern/Western outlook (e.g. calling for the return of English-medium schools). The conservative view stems from the history, or, for some, the memory, of the role English played in the colonial education system as the language of the elite which served to separate the urban and rural populations into the haves and the have-nots. Inevitably, the abolition of English-medium education became one of the key matters for debate during the campaign for independence from British rule in the 1950s. Malay nationalists considered English-medium education to be part of a British agenda to maintain control of the country after Independence. Replacing English with Malay as the medium of instruction as well as the national language in Malaya was, therefore, vital. In 1967, through the National Language Act, Malay became the sole official language in Malaysia a decade after Independence. Thus, from 1970 onwards, the phasing out of English as a medium of instruction from the Malaysian education system was carried out fervently, while at the same time Malay was zealously promoted, not only in education but in all spheres of public life.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Samah, Asiah Abu. 1994. ‘Language education policy planning in Malaysia: Concern for unity, reality and rationality.’ In Hassan, Abdullah (ed.), Language Planning in Southeast Asia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, pp. 5265.Google Scholar
Omar, Asmah Haji. 1992. ‘Attitude in the learning of English among Malaysian students: a case study.’ In Omar, Asmah Haji (ed.), The Linguistic Scenery in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka; Ministry of Education, Malaysia, pp. 117–42.Google Scholar
Omar, Asmah Haji. 1993. Language and Society in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Google Scholar
Omar, Asmah Haji. 1996. ‘Post-imperial English in Malaysia.’ In Fishman, J. A., Conrad, A. W. & Rubal-Lopez, A. (eds), Post-imperial English: status change in former British and American colonies, 1940–1990. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 513–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omar, Asmah Haji. 2000. ‘Managing languages in conflict situation: a special reference to the implementation of the policy on Malay and English in Malaysia.’ Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 10(2), 239–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omar, Asmah Haji. 2007. ‘Malaysia and Brunei.’ In Simpson, A. (ed.), Language and National Identity in Asia. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 337–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, S. K. 2002. ‘Language policy and English language standards in Malaysia: nationalism versus pragmatism.’ Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 12, 95115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heah, C. L. H. 1989. The Influence of English on the Lexical Expansion of Bahasa Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Hussein, Ismail. 1992. Sejarah Pertumbuhan Bahasa Kebangsaan Kita (The History of the Development of Our National Language). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Google Scholar
Jomo, K. S. 2004. The New Economic Policy and Interethnic Relations in Malaysia. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).Google Scholar
Lee, R. L. M. 1992. ‘Modernity, anti-modernity and post-modernity in Malaysia.’ International Sociology, 7(2), 153–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. P. (ed.). 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Sixteenth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online at <http://www.ethnologue.com/show_country.asp?name=Malaysia> (Accessed December 6, 2009).Google Scholar
Nagata, J. A. 1974. ‘What is a Malay? Situational selection of ethnic identity in a plural society.’ American Ethnologist, 1(2), 331–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Straits Times. 2009. ‘Why PPSMI reversal makes sense.’ 19 July. Online at <http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-205339294/why-ppsmi-reversal-makes.html> (Accessed June 1, 2012).+(Accessed+June+1,+2012).>Google Scholar
New York Times. 2009. ‘Malaysia ends use of English in science and math teaching.’ 9 July. Online at <http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/world/asia/09iht-malay.html?_r=0> (Accessed June 1, 2012).+(Accessed+June+1,+2012).>Google Scholar
Noss, R. 1967. ‘Language policy and higher education.’ Higher Education and Development in South-East Asia, Vol.III, Part 2. Paris: UNESCO and International Association of Universities, pp. 275396.Google Scholar
Ooi Keat, Gin. 2009. Historical Dictionary of Malaysia (Vol. 71). Plymouth, UK: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Rappa, A. L. & Wee, L. 2006. Language Policy and Modernity in Southeast Asia: Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segawa, N. 2007. ‘Malaysia's 1996 Education Act: the impact of a multiculturalism-type approach on national integration.’ SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 22(1), 3056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamsul, A. B. 1986. From British to Bumiputera Rule: Local Politics and Rural Development in Peninsular Malaysia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
The Star. 2009. ‘Divided over decision.’ July 12. ‘Parents unhappy over decision to revert.’ July 9. ‘Is there a need to revert?’ July 12. Online at <http://thestar.com.my/education/story.asp?file=/2009/7/12/education/4285102&sec=education>, <http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/7/9/nation/4286064&sec=nation>, <http://thestar.com.my/education/story.asp?file=/2009/7/12/education/4289537> respectively. (Accessed June 1, 2012).,+,++respectively.+(Accessed+June+1,+2012).>Google Scholar
The Star. 2011. ‘English pass a must soon.’ 14 September. Online at <http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?sec=nation&file=/2011/9/14/nation/9491830> (Accessed June 1, 2012).+(Accessed+June+1,+2012).>Google Scholar
The Star. 2013. ‘English may be made a must pass SPM subject in three years time.’ March 9. Online at <http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2013/3/9/nation/2812664&sec=nation> (Accessed March 9, 2013).+(Accessed+March+9,+2013).>Google Scholar
Wicks, P. 1980. ‘Education, British colonialism, and a plural society in West Malaysia: the development of education in the British settlements along the Straits of Malacca, 1786–1874.’ History of Education Quarterly, 20, 163–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar