Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T07:32:00.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The emergence of a new phonological feature in Pakistan English

Focusing on allophonic split in VOT of coronal stops in PakE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2021

Nasir A. Syed Open the ORCID record for Nasir A. Syed [Opens in a new window]  and
Shah Bibi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

English is used as a lingua franca in most parts of the world (Ozaki, 2011). However, problems and issues related to learning English are country specific (Nagamine, 2011), because most of the difficulties in foreign language learning arise from L1 interference (Flege, 1995). Since this study focuses on acoustic analysis of a phonological feature of Pakistan English (PakE), we outline the historical background of the issue very briefly. Pakistan is a linguistically rich country. More than 70 languages are spoken in Pakistan (Rahman, 1996). Saraiki, Balochi, Sindhi, Punjabi and Pashto are the major indigenous languages of the country. More than 90% of the total population speaks these languages. Pakistan came into being in 1947. It inherited English as a language of education, law, the judiciary and media from the British colonial masters. The British rulers also used the English language in India for official correspondence. Therefore, English became a very effective tool and symbol of power in the subcontinent. As a result, people of the subcontinent feel pride in learning English. Although the colonial period has ended and the English rulers have departed to their homeland, English still remains the language of ruling elite in Pakistan and India.

Type
Shorter Article
Information
English Today , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , December 2022 , pp. 278 - 283
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, A. 1993. ‘English in South Asia: A historical perspective.’ In Baumgardener, J. A. (ed.), The English Language in Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
Bashir, E. & Conners, T. J. 2019. A Descriptive Grammar of Hindko, Panjabi, and Saraiki. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgardener, J. A. 1993. The English Language in Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. 2019. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer.Google Scholar
Cho, T. & Ladefoged, P. 1999. ‘Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages.’ Journal of Phonetics, 27(2), 207–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Hume, E. V. 1995. ‘The internal organization of speech sounds.’ In Goldsmith, J. (ed.), A Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 245–306.Google Scholar
Costa, D. 2019. ‘Indian English: A national model.’ The Journal of English as an International Language, 14(2), 16–28.Google Scholar
David, A. B. 2014. Descriptive Grammar of Pashto and Its Dialects. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Docherty, G. J. 1992. The Timing of Voicing in British English Obstruents. Berlin: Foris Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. 1995. ‘Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems.’ In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-language Research. New York: Timonium, MD, pp. 233–77.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P., Docherty, G. & Jones, M. J. 2010. ‘Analyzing stops.’ In Foulkes, P., Docherty, G. J. & Jones, M. J. (eds.), Sociophonetics: A Student's Guide. London: Routledge, pp. 58–71.Google Scholar
Gargesh, R. 2004. ‘Indian English: Phonology.’ In Kortmann, B (ed.), A Handbook of Varieties of English. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 815–29.Google Scholar
Gargesh, R. 2019. ‘South Asian Englishes.’ In Nelson, C. L., Proshina, Z. G. & Davis, D. R. (eds.), The Handbook of World Englishes. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Inc., pp. 105–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. 2009. World Englishes: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Khan, M. K. & Bukhari, N. H. 2014. ‘Reversed sonority clusters in Pashto: An optimality theoretic justification.’ Kashmir Journal of Language Research, 17(1), 33–50.Google Scholar
Kula, N. C. & Syed, N. A. 2020. ‘Non-myopic nasal spreading in Saraiki.’ Radical: A Journal of Phonology, 1, 126–82.Google Scholar
Lisker, L. & Abramson, A. 1964. ‘A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements.’ Word, 20(3), 384–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, L. & Abramson, A. 1967. ‘Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops.’ Language and Speech, 10, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahboob, A. & Ahmar, N. H. 2004. ‘Pakistani English: Phonology.’ In Schneider, E. W. (ed.), A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1003–15.Google Scholar
Nagamine, T. 2011. ‘Effects of hyper-pronunciation training method on Japanese university students’ pronunciation.’ Asia EFL Journal, 53, 35–50.Google Scholar
Nasukawa, K. 2010. ‘Place-dependent VOT in L2 acquisition.’ In Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 198–210.Google Scholar
Ozaki, S. 2011. ‘Learning English as an international lingua franca in a semi-English-speaking country: The Philippines.’ Asian EFL Journal, 53, 51–60.Google Scholar
Rahman, T. 1991. ‘Pakistani English: Some phonological and phonetic features.’ World Englishes, 10(1), 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, T. 1996. Language and Politics in Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rahman, T. 2020. ‘Pakistani English.’ In Bolton, K., Botha, W. & Kirkpatrick, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Asian Englishes. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 279–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sailaja, P. 2009. Dialects of English: Indian English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. 2001. ‘Directional asymmetries in place assimilation.’ In Hume, E. & Johnson, K. (eds.), The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology. London: Academic Press, pp. 219–50.Google Scholar
Syed, N. A. 2013a. ‘Influence of L1 laryngeal contrast in acquisition of allophonic variance in English plosives.’ Balochistan Journal of Linguistics, 1, 45–65.Google Scholar
Syed, N. A. 2013b. ‘Voice onset time (VOT) for voiceless plosives in Pashto (L1) and English (L2).’ Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 21(3), 79–94.Google Scholar
Syed, N. A. 2015. ‘The role of teacher in second language learning.’ The NUML Journal of Critical Inquiry, 13(1), 71–91.Google Scholar
Syed, N. A., Ansari, S. & Gopang, I. B. 2017. ‘Perception and production of consonants of English by Pakistani speakers.’ International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(3), 201–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syed, N. A. & Saleem, A. 2019. ‘A review of the speech learning model in the perspectives of learners of English in Pakistan.’ Journal of Independent Studies and Research, 17(2), 85–110.Google Scholar
Wiltshire, C. R. 2005. ‘The Indian English of Tibeto-Burman language speakers.’ English World-Wide, 26(3), 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltshire, C. R. & Harnsberger, J. D. 2006. ‘The influence of Gujarati and Tamil L1s on Indian English: A preliminary study.’ World Englishes, 25(1), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y. 2013. ‘ProsodyPro – A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis.’ TRASP.Google Scholar