Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:31:01.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An athletes [sic] performance: Can a possessive apostrophe predict success?

Misplace apostrophes, miss out on med school?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2017

Michael Cop  and
Hunter Hatfield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

If we believe social media, newspapers, and even some of our best friends and colleagues, the war over standard usage is on. As with many wars, the opposing sides seem to be entrenched in differing ideological positions and many of the battles seem to take place over the most unstable, smallest bits of territory - such as the Oxford comma, singular they, or split infinitives. In this ongoing war, possessive apostrophes have attracted particularly aggressive forays. For example, when some English cities proposed removing apostrophes from street signs, various news outlets published headlines such as, ‘It's a catastrophe for the apostrophe in Britain’ (NBC, 31 January, 2009), ‘Dropped apostrophes spark grammar war in Britain’ (New York Times, 16 March, 2013), and ‘“It's pandering to the lowest common denominator”: Anger as Cambridge bans apostrophe from street names’ (Daily Mail, 18 January, 2014). Explaining Birmingham's ban, one city councillor was not that much less sensational, stating that apostrophes ‘denote possessions that are no longer accurate, and are not needed’ and that ‘they confuse people. If I want to go to a restaurant, I don't want to have an A-level (high school diploma) in English to find it’ (NBC).

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 39 - 45
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beal, J. C. 2010. ‘The grocer's apostrophe: Popular prescriptivism in the 21st century.’ English Today, 26(2), 57–64.Google Scholar
Bryant, P., Devine, M., Ledward, A., & Nunes, T. 1997. ‘Spelling with Apostrophes and Understanding Possession.’ British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 91–100.Google Scholar
Butterfield, J. (ed.) 2015. Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordeiro, P., Giacobbe, M. E. & Cazden, C. 1983. ‘Apostrophes, quotation marks, and periods: Learning punctuation in the first grade.’ Language Arts, 60(3), 323–332.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 2006. The Fight for English: How Language Pundits Ate, Shot, and Left. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Daily Mail. 2014. ‘“It's pandering to the lowest common denominator”: Anger as Cambridge bans apostrophe from street names.’ January, 18. Online at <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2541604/Cambridge-bans-apostrophe-street-names.html> (accessed September 9, 2015). (accessed September 9, 2015).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Daily+Mail.+2014.+‘“It's+pandering+to+the+lowest+common+denominator”:+Anger+as+Cambridge+bans+apostrophe+from+street+names.’+January,+18.+Online+at++(accessed+September+9,+2015).>Google Scholar
Francis, W. N. & Kučera, H. 1982. Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Garret, P. & Austin, C. 1993. ‘The English genitive apostrophe: Judgements of errors and implications for teaching.’ Language Awareness, 2(2), 61–75.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1676. Homer's Iliads in English. London.Google Scholar
Hokanson, L. & Kemp, N. 2013. ‘Adults’ spelling and understanding of possession and plurality: An intervention study.’ Reading and Writing, 26(2), 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, J. A. 1922a. ‘A study of high school spelling material.’ Journal of Education Psychology, 13(2), 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, J. A. 1922b. ‘A study of high school spelling material II.’ Journal of Education Psychology, 13(3), 152–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, G. 1986. ‘The ambivalent apostrophe.’ English Today, 2, 15–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modern Language Association of America. 2009. MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. 7th edn. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Morris, H. 2013. ‘Dropped apostrophes spark grammar war in Britain.’ New York Times, March, 16. Online at <http://rendezvous.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/16/dropped-apostrophe-sparks-grammar-war/?_r=0> (accessed September 10, 2015).+(accessed+September+10,+2015).>Google Scholar
NBC News. 2009. ‘It's a catastrophe for the apostrophe in Britain.’ January 31. Online at < http://www.nbcnews.com/id/28938136/ns/world_news-europe/t/its-catastrophe-apostrophe-britain/#.VfCjcH1d_S1> (accessed September 10, 2015). (accessed September 10, 2015).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=NBC+News.+2009.+‘It's+a+catastrophe+for+the+apostrophe+in+Britain.’+January+31.+Online+at+<+http://www.nbcnews.com/id/28938136/ns/world_news-europe/t/its-catastrophe-apostrophe-britain/#.VfCjcH1d_S1>+(accessed+September+10,+2015).>Google Scholar
Priestley, J. 1761. The Rudiments of English Grammar; Adapted to the Use of Schools. London.Google Scholar
Sklar, E. S. 1976. ‘The possessive apostrophe: The development and decline of a crooked mark.’ College English, 38(2), 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teitelbaum, H. 1993. ‘The case of the missing apostrophe.’ The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 67(1), 23–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truss, L. 2003. Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation. London: Profile.Google Scholar