Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Tuggy, David
1996.
Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods.
p.
713.
SHIBASAKI, REIJIROU
2014.
ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF <i>THE POINT IS </i>AND RELATED ISSUES IN THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN ENGLISH.
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 1,
p.
79.
Massam, Diane
and
Grant, Erin
2014.
Given two be’s, how do they Agree?.
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique,
Vol. 59,
Issue. 3,
p.
395.
Keizer, Evelien
2016.
Outside the Clause.
Vol. 178,
Issue. ,
p.
59.
McGregor, William B.
2017.
There’s grammar and there’s grammar just as there’s usage and there’s usage.
English Text Construction,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 2,
p.
199.
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2018.
Explorations in English Historical Syntax.
Vol. 198,
Issue. ,
p.
283.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2020.
How the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model might enrich Diachronic Construction Grammar.
Belgian Journal of Linguistics,
Vol. 34,
Issue. ,
p.
306.
Sabio, Frédéric
2021.
Le souci est, c'est que cette modification se fait à l'insu de l'utilisateur.
Corela,
Hundt, Marianne
and
Oppliger, Rahel
2022.
(The) fact is …/(Die) Tatsache ist …focaliser constructions in English and German are similar but subject to different constraints.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Keizer, Evelien
and
Sommerer, Lotte
2022.
English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective.
Vol. 221,
Issue. ,
p.
2.
Hundt, Marianne
2022.
N-isFocalizers as Semi-fixed Constructions: Modeling Variation across World Englishes.
Journal of English Linguistics,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 2,
p.
115.