Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:06:27.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aureate or inkpot?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

Keith White
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

KEITH WHITE discusses the tradition of ornate technical terms in English and their emergence in contemporary literary theory

Type
Lexicon
Information
English Today , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , October 1991 , pp. 45 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baugh., Albert C., and Thomas, Cable. 1978. A History of the English Language. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Blount, Thomas. 1656. Glossographia. Menston, England: Facsimile reprint, the Scolar Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Bullokar, John. 1616. An English Expositor. Menston, England: Facsimile reprint, the Scolar Press, Ltd., 1969.Google Scholar
Cawdrey, Robert. 1604. A Table Alphabeticall. New York: reprinted by Da Capo Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Mendenhall, John Cooper. 1919. Aureate Terms. Lancaster, Pennysylvania: Wickersham Printing Company.Google Scholar
Nicoll, Allardyce, Ed. 1956. Chapman’s Homer. 2 Vols. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Rollins, Hyder Edward. 1958/1976. The Letters of John Keats. 2 Vols, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Starnes, DeWitt T. and Noyes., Gertrude E.. 1946. The English Dictionary from Cawdrey to Johnson. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar