Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Fitzmaurice, Susan
2000.
Tentativeness and insistence in the expression of politeness in Margaret Cavendish’s Sociable Letters.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
p.
7.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
and
Dasher, Richard B.
2001.
Regularity in Semantic Change.
ZIEGELER, DEBRA
2003.
REDEFINING UNIDIRECTIONALITY: INSIGHTS FROM DEMODALISATION.
Folia Linguistica Historica,
Vol. 37,
Issue. Historica vol. 24,1-2,
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003.
Motives for Language Change.
p.
124.
Ziegeler, D.P.
2006.
Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics.
p.
259.
Ziegeler, Debra
2006.
Omnitemporal will.
Language Sciences,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 1,
p.
76.
Combettes, Bernard
2006.
Du niveau textuel au niveau énonciatif dans la grammaticalisation : le rôle du contexte.
Langue française,
Vol. n° 149,
Issue. 1,
p.
48.
Combettes, Bernard
and
Kuyumcuyan, Annie
2007.
La formation des modalisateurs en français : le cas des locutions formées sur vérité.
Langue française,
Vol. n° 156,
Issue. 4,
p.
76.
Anscombre, Jean-Claude
Rodríguez Somolinos, Amalia
Arroyo, Alvaro
Rouanne, Laurence
Foullioux, Caroline
Jesús Saló, Mª
and
Gómez-Jordana Ferary, Sonia
2009.
Apparences, indices et attitude énonciative : le cas de apparemment.
Langue française,
Vol. n° 161,
Issue. 1,
p.
39.
LOUREIRO-PORTO, LUCÍA
2010.
Verbo-nominal constructions of necessity withþearfn. andneedn.: competition and grammaticalization from OE to eModE.
English Language and Linguistics,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 3,
p.
373.
Finlay, Stephen
2010.
What ought probably means, and why you can’t detach it.
Synthese,
Vol. 177,
Issue. 1,
p.
67.
DEPRAETERE, ILSE
and
REED, SUSAN
2011.
Towards a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility.
English Language and Linguistics,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Schroeder, Mark
2011.
Ought, Agents, and Actions.
The Philosophical Review,
Vol. 120,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Keiichi Eto
2011.
Examining the Usage of Ought to in Movie Scripts.
STEM Journal,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
241.
Huitink, J.
2012.
Modal Concord: A Case Study of Dutch.
Journal of Semantics,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 3,
p.
403.
Braun, David
2013.
Invariantism about ‘can’ and ‘may’ (as well as ‘might’).
Linguistics and Philosophy,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 2,
p.
181.
Yanovich, Igor
2013.
Invariantist ‘might’ and modal meaning change.
Linguistics and Philosophy,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 2,
p.
175.
Verhulst, An
Depraetere, Ilse
and
Heyvaert, Liesbet
2013.
Source and strength of modality: An empirical study of root should, ought to and be supposed to in Present-day British English.
Journal of Pragmatics,
Vol. 55,
Issue. ,
p.
210.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2014.
Grammaticalization – Theory and Data.
Vol. 162,
Issue. ,
p.
87.
Depraetere, Ilse
2014.
Modals and lexically-regulated saturation.
Journal of Pragmatics,
Vol. 71,
Issue. ,
p.
160.