Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:40:35.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rochelle Lieber, English nouns: The ecology of nominalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Pp. ix + 197. ISBN 9781107161375.

Review products

Rochelle Lieber, English nouns: The ecology of nominalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Pp. ix + 197. ISBN 9781107161375.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Artemis Alexiadou
Artemis Alexiadou*
Affiliation:
Department of English and American Studies, English Linguistics Humboldt Universität zu Berlin & Leibniz-ZAS, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 735 - 739
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2017. On the complex relationship between deverbal compounds and argument supporting nominals. In Bloch-Trojnar, Maria & Malicka-Kleparska, Anna (eds.), Aspect and valency in nominals, 53–82. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Grimshaw, Jane B.. 2008. Nouns, verbs and affixation. In Florian Schäfer (ed.), SinSpeC (1): Working Papers of the SFB 732, 1–16.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Iordachioaia, Gianina & Soare, Elena. 2010. Number/aspect interactions in the syntax of nominalizations: A distributed morphology approach. Journal of Linguistics 46, 537–74.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2013. Taking form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, Roderick A. & Rosenbaum, Peter S. (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar
Fabregas, Antonio. 2014. Argument structure and morphologically underived nouns in Spanish and English. Lingua 141, 97–120Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane B. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2009. The morphology of nominalization and the syntax of vP. In Giannakidou, Anastasia & Rathert, Monika (eds.), Quantification, definiteness and nominalization, 312–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iordachioaia, Gianina, Alexiadou, Artemis & Pairamidis, Andreas. 2017. Morphosyntactic sources for nominal synthetic compounds in English and Greek. In Jörg Meibauer & Petra M. Vogel (eds.), Zusammenbildungen / Synthetic compounds, special issue of Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word-formation 1, 47–72.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert. 1960. The grammar of English nominalization. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2009. Current challenges to the lexicalist hypothesis: An overview and a critique. In Lewis, William D., Karimi, Simin, Harley, Heidi & Farrar, Scott O. (eds.), Time and again: Theoretical prespectives on formal linguistics in Honor of D. Terence Langendoen, 91–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar