We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Lotte Sommerer and Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar (Constructional Approaches to Language 27). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2020. Pp. vi + 355. ISBN 9789027205445.
Review products
Lotte Sommerer and Elena Smirnova (eds.), Nodes and networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar (Constructional Approaches to Language 27). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2020. Pp. vi + 355. ISBN 9789027205445.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
14 June 2021
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Booij, Geert. 2016. Construction morphology. In Hippisley, Andrew & Stump, Gregory (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 424–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutsoukos, Nikos, Van Goethem, Kristel & De Smet, Hendrik. 2018. Asymmetries, mismatches and construction grammar: An introduction. Constructions and Frames10(2), 123–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel & Van Goethem, Kristel. 2018. Debonding and clipping of prefixoids in Germanic: Constructionalization or constructional change? In Booij, Geert (ed.), The construction of words: Advances in construction morphology, 197–240. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar