Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:08:15.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

L. Brinton, Pragmatic markers in English: grammaticalization and discourse functions. Topics in English Linguistics 19. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1996. Pp. xvi + 412. Cloth DM 168, ISBN 3 11 014872 2.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2008

Terttu Nevalainen
Affiliation:
Department of EnglishPO Box 4 (Yliopistonkatu 3)FIN-00014 University of [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd edn.London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. (1990). Modelling functional differentiation and function loss: the case of but. In Adamson, S., Law, V., Vincent, N. & Wright, S. (eds.), Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 65). Amsterdam & Philadelphia:Benjamins. 337–55.Google Scholar
Östman, J-O. (1995). Pragmatic particles twenty years after. In Wårvik, B., Tanskanen, S-K. & Hiltunen, R. (eds.), Organization in discourse (Anglistica Turkuensia 14). Turku: University of Turku. 97108.Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, M. (1996). The rise and fall of METHINKS. In Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language history: studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence (Language and Computers 15). Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi. 131–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1982). From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: some semantic–pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Lehmann, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 24). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 245–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1990). From less to more situated in language: the unidirectionality of semantic change. In Adamson, S., Law, V., Vincent, N. &Wright, S. (eds.), Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 65). Amsterdam & Philadelphia:Benjamins. 497–517.Google Scholar