Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:43:38.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kristin Bech and Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds.), Grammar – discourse – context: Grammar and usage in language variation and change (Diskursmuster – Discourse Patterns 23). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2019. Pp. 375. ISBN 9783110682496.

Review products

Kristin Bech and Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds.), Grammar – discourse – context: Grammar and usage in language variation and change (Diskursmuster – Discourse Patterns 23). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2019. Pp. 375. ISBN 9783110682496.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2021

Mareike L. Keller Open the ORCID record for Mareike L. Keller [Opens in a new window]
Mareike L. Keller*
Affiliation:
University of Mannheim Anglistik I Schloss [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 223 - 228
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2010. On some problem areas in grammaticalization studies. In Stathi, Ekaterini, Gehweiler, Elke & König, Ekkehard (eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues, 17–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 1994. The fortunes of the Latin-type accusative and infinitive construction in Dutch and English compared. In Swan, Toril, Mørck, Endre & Westvik, Olaf Jansen (eds.), Language change and language structure: Older Germanic languages in a comparative perspective, 91–133. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2012. The status of the postposed ‘and-adjective’ construction in Old English: Attributive or predicative? In Denison, David, Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo, McCully, Chris & Moore, Emma (eds.), Analysing older English, 251–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haumann, Dagmar. 2010. Adnominal adjectives in Old English. English Language and Linguistics 14(1), 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1992. Grammaticalization and grammar. Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk. 2008. The nominative and infinitive in Late Modern English: A diachronic constructionist approach. Journal of English Linguistics 36(4), 314–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, candlelight, and stuff like that: General extenders in English discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar