Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:16:40.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How do grammatical patterns emerge? The origins and development of the English proper noun modifier construction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2019

TINE BREBAN  and
HENDRIK DE SMET
TINE BREBAN
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics and English Language, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom, [email protected]
HENDRIK DE SMET
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Leuven, Blijde-Inkomststraat 21, bus 3308, B-3000 Leuven, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article studies the emergence of a grammatical pattern, the proper noun modifier construction shown in the Obama administration, an Edinburgh restaurant. The only dedicated historical corpus study, by Rosenbach (2007, 2010), is limited in terms of time depth and data included, and suggests that only proper noun modifiers denoting places such as Edinburgh are found in the early seventeenth century. Using corpus data that span the full history of English, we trace the construction back to two Old English precursors, genitival modifiers without inflectional marking, e.g. Jericho feldes ‘the fields of Jericho’, and compounds, e.g. Easter æfen ‘Easter eve’. We combine macro-level visualisations of distributions and qualitative micro-analyses to show how these source constructions developed into the present-day English construction. The development defies simplistic views on grammatical change, but illustrates that grammatical patterns develop out of multiple sources under the influence of a multiplicity of factors. New patterns only emerge gradually and exploit existing ambiguities in the language.

Keywords

proper noun modifiercompound-s-less genitivemultiple source constructiongradual change
Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 23 , Special Issue 4: Different perspectives on proper noun modifiers , December 2019 , pp. 879 - 899
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We'd like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for the time generously spent reading and commenting on the first version of this article. Tine Breban is grateful to the AHRC which funded the Leadership Fellowship (AH/N002911/1) during which this research was carried out.

References

Aarts, Bas. 2007. Syntactic gradience: The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt. 1982. The genitive v. the of-construction: A study of syntactic variation in 17th century English. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 2016. Synchronic versus diachronic explanation and the nature of the Language Faculty. Annual Review of Linguistics 2(1), 11–31.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2011. Grammar emerging in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics 15(2), 223–50.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2016. Grammatical complexity in academic English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Joseph & Toller, Thomas Northcote (ed.). 1898. An Anglo-Saxon dictionary: Based on the manuscript collections of the late Joseph Bosworth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Breban, Tine. 2018. Proper names used as modifiers: A comprehensive functional analysis. English Language and Linguistics 22(3), 381–400. [Published online 2017]Google Scholar
Breban, Tine & Kolkmann, Julia (eds.). 2019. Different perspectives on proper noun modifiers. Special issue, English Language and Linguistics 23(4).Google Scholar
Breban, Tine, Kolkmann, Julia & Payne, John. 2019. The impact of semantic relations on grammatical alternation: An experimental study of proper name modifiers and determiner genitives. English Language and Linguistics 23(4), 797–826.Google Scholar
Crist, Sean & Tichý, Ondřej. 2010. Online edition of An Anglo-Saxon dictionary. Faculty of Arts, Charles University Prague. www.bosworthtoller.comGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2017. Implicational universals and dependencies. In Enfield, Nick J. (ed.), Dependencies in language: On the causal ontology of linguistic systems, 9–23. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2010–. The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. http://corpus.byu.edu/coha/Google Scholar
Denison, David. 2001. Gradience and linguistic change. In Brinton, Laurel J. (ed.), Historical linguistics 1999, 119–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2013. Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik, Ghesquière, Lobke & Van de Velde, Freek (eds.). 2015. On multiple source constructions in language change. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [First published as Studies in Language 37(3) in 2013]Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1987. Emergent grammar. In Aske, Jon, Beery, Natasha, Michaelis, Laura & Filip, Hana (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on grammar and cognition, 139–57. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. I: Theoretical and methodological issues, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2015. Multiple sources and multiple causes multiply explored. In De Smet et al. (eds.), 205–21.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1992. Semantics and vocabulary. In Hogg, Richard M. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. I: The beginnings to 1066, 290–408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Delfs, Lauren. 2004. The Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, first edition, release 3 (www.ling.upenn.edu/ppche/ppche-release-2016/PPCEME-RELEASE-3).Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann. 2000. The Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, second edition, release 4 (www.ling.upenn.edu/ppche/ppche-release-2016/PPCME2-RELEASE-4).Google Scholar
Markus, Manfred. 1992–7. Innsbruck Corpus of Middle English Prose Sampler. Institut für Anglistik, Universität Innsbruck. CD-ROM (www.uibk.ac.at/anglistik/research/projects/icamet/).Google Scholar
OED: Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford University Press. www.oed.comGoogle Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette. 2002. Genitive variation in English: Conceptual factors in synchronic and diachronic studies. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette. 2006. Descriptive genitives in English: A case study on constructional gradience. English Language and Linguistics 10(1), 77–118.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette. 2007. Emerging variation: Determiner genitives and noun modifiers in English. English Language and Linguistics 11(1), 143–89.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette. 2010. How synchronic gradience makes sense in the light of language change (and vice versa). In Traugott & Trousdale (eds.), 149–79.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette. 2019. On the (non-)equivalence of constructions with determiner genitives and noun modifiers in English. English Language and Linguistics 23(4), 759–96.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette, Stein, Dieter & Vezzosi, Letizia. 2000. On the history of the s-genitive. In Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo, Denison, David, Hogg, Richard M. & Cully, C. B. (eds.), Generative theory and corpus study: A dialogue from 10 ICEHL, 183–210. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schlücker, Barbara. 2013. Non-classifying compounds in German. Folia Linguistica 47(2), 449–80.Google Scholar
Ström Herold, Jenny & Levin, Magnus. 2019. The Obama presidency, the Macintosh keyboard and the Norway fiasco: English proper noun modifiers and their German and Swedish correspondences. English Language and Linguistics 23(4), 827–54.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann, Warner, Anthony, Pintzuk, Susan & Beths, Frank. 2003. The York–Toronto–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose (YCOE). Department of language and Linguistic Science, University of York. CD-ROM (www-users.york.ac.uk/~lang22/YCOE/YcoeHome.htm).Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme (eds.). 2010a. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2010b. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. How do they intersect? In Traugott & Trousdale (eds.), 19–44.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek, De Smet, Hendrik & Ghesquière, Lobke. 2015. On multiple source constructions in language change. In De Smet et al. (eds.), 1–18.Google Scholar