Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:52:05.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The coding of perfect meaning in African, Asian and Caribbean Englishes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

CRISTINA SUÁREZ-GÓMEZ
CRISTINA SUÁREZ-GÓMEZ*
Affiliation:
Department of Spanish, Modern and Classical Languages, University of the Balearic Islands, Ctra. de Valldemossa, km. 7.5, 07122 Palma (Balearic Islands), [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The perfect in World Englishes has attracted much attention recently, especially from a semasiological perspective, in which the analytic have + participle is analysed in comparison with the synthetic preterite. This article intends to achieve a more holistic picture of the expression of perfect meaning in World Englishes, which allows us to identify how perfect meaning is expressed in all pragmatic contexts. In this study, all the occurrences of ten high-frequency verbs are examined in order to single out those expressing perfect meaning. The corpus (8.8m words in total) includes ten components of the International Corpus of English: eight Outer Circle varieties from Africa, Asia and the Caribbean, and two reference varieties: British and American English. The relevant examples are tabulated across variables such as presence of adverbials, type of perfect meaning, lexical verb, mode, text type and evolutionary stage. The results show that the envelope of variation is much wider than the one traditionally acknowledged in current grammars of English, and that type of meaning, lexical verb or text type are crucial determiners in the choice of particular forms to express perfect meaning. By contrast, mode or evolutionary stage does not seem to have a bearing on the differences between varieties.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 509 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am indebted to Elena Seoane for her help with earlier versions of this article, and two anonymous reviewers for their thorough and valuable comments. I am also grateful to Bernd Kortmann for his observations as editor of the journal. Any errors remain my sole responsibility. For generous financial support, I am grateful to the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Grant No. FFI2014-53930-P).

References

Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan. 2009. Register, genre and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey N., Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Brato, Torsten & Huber, Magnus. 2012. English in Africa. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Areal features in the Anglophone world, 161–84. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Christie, Pauline. 2003. Language in Jamaica. Kingston: Arawak.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1999. Perfect. In Brown, Keith & Miller, Jim (eds.), Concise encyclopaedia of grammatical categories, 30–7. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Hedin, Eva. 2000. Current relevance and event reference. In Dahl, Östen (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology. Eurotyp 20–6), 385–401. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Velupillai, Viveka. 2013. The perfect. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, http://wals.info/chapter/68 (accessed 17 May 2017).Google Scholar
Davydova, Julia. 2011. The present perfect in non-native Englishes: A corpus-based study of variation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Davydova, Julia. 2013. Detecting historical continuity in a linguistically diverse area: The present perfect in modern Singapore English. In Duarte, Joana & Gogolin, Ingrid (eds.), Linguistic super-diversity in urban areas: Research approaches (Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity), 193–225. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar. 2014. English in the Caribbean: Variation, style and standards in Jamaica and Trinidad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elsness, Johan. 1997. The perfect and the preterite in contemporary and earlier English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Robert. 2016. The frequency of the present perfect in varieties of English around the world. In Werner, Seoane & Suárez-Gómez (eds.), 223–58.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Andrew. 2004. The social dimension of Philippine English. World Englishes 23, 7–16.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sydney. 1996. Introducing ICE. In Greenbaum, Sydney (ed.), Comparing English worldwide: The International Corpus of English, 3–12. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Gut, Ulrike. 2009. Past tense marking. English World-Wide 30 (3), 262–77.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson-Ettle, Diana & Schmied, Josef. 1999. Manual to accompany the East African Component of the International Corpus of English. Chemnitz: Chemnitz University of Technology, Department of English.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2013. The diversification of English: Old, new and emerging epicentres. In Schreier, Daniel & Hundt, Marianne (eds.), English as a contact language, 182–203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2015. World Englishes. In Biber, Douglas & Reppen, Randi (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics, 381–400. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne 2016. Error, feature, (incipient) change – or something else altogether? On the role of low-frequency deviant patterns for the description of Englishes. In Seoane, Elena & Suárez-Gómez, Cristina (eds.), World Englishes: New theoretical and methodological considerations, 37–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. The present perfect in British and American English: Has there been any change, recently? ICAME Journal 33, 45–63.Google Scholar
ICE: International Corpus of English. http://ice-corpora.net/ice/ (accessed 15 December 2016).Google Scholar
Kandiah, Thiru. 1998. Epiphanies of the deathless native user's manifold avatars: A post-colonial perspective on the native speaker. In Singh, Rajendra (ed.), The native speaker: Multilingual perspectives, 79–110. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1991. The triad tense – aspect – Aktionsart: Problems and possible solutions. In Vetters, Carl & Vandeweghe, Willy (eds.), Perspectives on aspect and Aktionsart (Belgian Journal of Linguistics 6), 9–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin (eds.). 2013. The electronic world atlas of varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, http://ewave-atlas.org (accessed 15 December 2016).Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Schneider, Agnes. 2011. Grammaticalization in non-standard varieties of English. In Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 263–78. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Wolk, Christoph. 2012. Morphosyntactic variation in the anglophone world: A global perspective. In Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin (eds.), The mouton world atlas of variation in English, 906–36. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Körtvelyessy, Mirjami, Bernaisch, Tobias, Mukherjee, Joybrato & Mendis, Dushyanthi. 2012. Manual to the written component of the International Corpus of English – Sri Lanka. Giessen: Justus Liebig University, Department of English.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2013. The World System of Englishes: Accounting for the transnational importance of mobile and mediated vernaculars. English World-Wide 34 (3), 253–78.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2015. Cross-variety diachronic drifts and ephemeral regional contrasts: An analysis of modality in the extended Brown family of corpora and what it can tell us about the New Englishes. In Collins, Peter (ed.) Grammatical change in English world-wide, 119–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Miller, Jim. 2000. The perfect in spoken and written English. Transactions of the Philological Society 98 (2), 323–52.Google Scholar
Miller, Jim. 2004. Perfect and resultative constructions in spoken and non-standard English. In Fischer, Olga, Norde, Muriel & Perridon, Harry (eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization, 229–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 1999. Syntax. In Lass, Roger (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol III: 1476–1776, 187–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Björn. 2008. The perfect time Span: On the present perfect in Swedish, German and English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sand, Andrea. 1999. Linguistic variation in Jamaica: A corpus-based study of radio and newspaper usage. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Schaub, Steffen. 2016. The influence of register on noun phrase complexity in varieties of English. In Schubert, Christof & Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina (eds.), Variational text linguistics: Revisiting register in English, 251–70. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar. 2007. Postcolonial Englishes: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seoane, Elena. 2016a. The perfect in creole-related varieties of English: The case of Jamaican English. In Werner, Seoane & Suárez-Gómez (eds.), 195–221.Google Scholar
Seoane, Elena. 2016b. The entrenchment of new grammatical markers in World Englishes from a Usage-Based Theory perspective. Presented at 4th International Conference of the International Society for the Linguistics of English (ISLE-4), University of Poznan.Google Scholar
Seoane, Elena & Suárez-Gómez, Cristina. 2013. The expression of the perfect in East and South-East Asian Englishes. English World-Wide 34, 1–25.Google Scholar
Suárez-Gómez, Cristina & Seoane, Elena. 2013. They have published a new cultural policy that just come out: Competing forms in spoken and written New Englishes. In Bech, Kristin & Andersen, Gisle (eds.), English corpus linguistics: Variation in time, space and genre, 163–82. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 1996. Has it ever been ‘perfect’? Uncovering the grammar of early Black English. York Papers in Linguistics 17, 351–96.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2000. The grammaticalization of the present perfect in English. In Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Annette & Stein, Dieter (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization of English, 329–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Herk, Gerard. 2008. Letter perfect: The present perfect in early African American correspondence. English World-Wide 29 (1), 45–69.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, Bertus. 2009. The shared core of the perfect across Englishes: A corpus-based analysis. In Hoffmann, Thomas & Siebers, Lucia (eds.), World Englishes: Problems, properties and prospects. Selected papers from the 13th IAWE conference, 309–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, Bertus 2016. Present perfect and past tense in Black South African English. In Werner, Seoane & Suárez-Gómez (eds.), 149–68.Google Scholar
Werner, Valentin. 2013. Temporal adverbials and the present perfect/past tense alternation. English World-Wide 34 (2), 202–40.Google Scholar
Werner, Valentin. 2014. The present perfect in World Englishes: Charting unity and diversity. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.Google Scholar
Werner, Valentin. 2016. Rise of the undead? be-perfects in World Englishes. In Werner, Seoane & Suárez-Gómez (eds.), 259–94.Google Scholar
Werner, Valentin & Fuchs, Robert. 2017. The present perfect in Nigerian English. English Language and Linguistics 21 (1), 129–53.Google Scholar
Werner, Valentin, Seoane, Elena & Suárez-Gómez, Cristina. 2016 (eds.). Reassessing the present perfect: Corpus studies and beyond (Topics in English Linguistics – TiEL). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1993. Variability in the use of perfect have in Trinidadian English: A problem of categorical and semantic mismatch. Language Variation and Change 5, 141–88.Google Scholar
Xiao, Richard. 2009. Multidimensional analysis and the study of world Englishes. World Englishes 28 (4), 421–50.Google Scholar
Yao, Xiao & Collins, Peter. 2012. The present perfect in world Englishes. World Englishes 31 (3), 386–403.Google Scholar
Yerastov, Yuri. 2015. A construction grammar analysis of the transitive be perfect in present-day Canadian English. English Language and Linguistics 19 (1), 157–78.Google Scholar