Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:33:25.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Celtic influence on Old English: phonological and phonetic evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

PETER SCHRIJVER*
Affiliation:
Celtic Languages and Culture, Department of Modern Languages, University of Utrecht, Trans 10, 3512 JK Utrecht, The [email protected]

Abstract

It has generally been assumed that Celtic linguistic influence on Old English is limited to a few marginal loanwords. If a language shift had taken place from Celtic to Old English, however, one would expect to find traces of that in Old English phonology and (morpho)syntax. In this article I argue that (1) the way in which the West Germanic sound system was reshaped in Old English strongly suggests the operation of a hitherto unrecognized substratum; (2) that phonetic substratum is strongly reminiscent of Irish rather than British Celtic; (3) the Old Irish phonetic−phonological system provides a more plausible model for reconstructing the phonetics of pre-Roman Celtic in Britain than the British Celtic system. The conclusion is that there is phonetic continuity between pre-Roman British Celtic and Old English, which suggests the presence of a pre-Anglo-Saxon population shifting to Old English.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bird, Barbara. 1997. Past and present studies of Hebridean English phonology. In Tristram, Hildegard (ed.), The Celtic Englishes, 287300. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar
Borgstrøm, Carl. 1974. On the influence of Norse on Scottish Gaelic. Lochlann 6, 91103.Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair. 1968. Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Daunt, Marjorie. 1939. Old English sound changes reconsidered in relation to scribal tradition and practice. Transactions of the Philological Society, 108–37.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani & Pitkänen, Heli (eds.). 2002. The Celtic roots of English. Joensuu: University of Joensuu, Faculty of Humanities.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Katherine. 1997. Language in Pictland. Utrecht: de Keltische Draak.Google Scholar
Greene, David. 1973. The growth of palatalization in Irish. Transactions of the Philological Society, 127–36.Google Scholar
Greene, David. 1976. The diphthongs of Old Irish. Ériu 27, 2645.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. 1992. A grammar of Old English, vol. 1: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Higham, Nicholas (ed.). 2007. Britons in Anglo-Saxon England. Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, Graham R. 2003. Some Old-Irish etymologies, and some conclusions drawn from them. Ériu 53, 151–5.Google Scholar
Jackson, Kenneth. 1953. Language and history in early Britain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Kenneth. 1955. The Pictish language. In Wainwright, Frederick (ed.), The problem of the Picts, 129–66. Edinburgh: Nelson.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1992. Semantics and vocabulary. In Hogg, Richard (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. II: The beginnings to 1066, 290408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laker, Stephen. 2002. An explanation for the changes kw-, hw- > χw- in the English dialects. In Filppula et al. (eds.), 183–98.+χw-+in+the+English+dialects.+In+Filppula+et+al.+(eds.),+183–98.>Google Scholar
McCone, Kim. 1996. Towards a relative chronology of ancient and medieval Celtic sound change. Maynooth: Department of Old and Middle Irish, St Patrick's College.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Hans F. 1985. Old English and the continental Germanic languages. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Raftery, Barry. 1994. Pagan Celtic Ireland. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Sammallahti, Pekka. 1984. New developments in Inari Lappish phonology. In Hajdú, Péter & Honti, László (eds.), Studien zur phonologischen Beschreibung uralischer Sprachen, 303–10. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 1995. Studies in British Celtic historical phonology. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 1999. The Celtic contribution to the development of the North Sea Germanic vowel system, with special reference to Coastal Dutch. NOWELE 35, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2000. Non-Indo-European surviving in Ireland in the first millennium AD. Ériu 51, 95–9.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2002. The rise and fall of British Latin: Evidence from English and Brittonic. In Filppula et al. (eds.), 87–110.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2005a. Early Celtic diphthongization and the Celtic-Latin interface. In de Hoz, J., Luján, E. & Sims-Williams, P. (eds.), New approaches to Celtic place-names in Ptolemy's Geography, 5567. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2005b. More on non-Indo-European surviving in Ireland in the first millennium AD. Ériu 55, 137–44.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2007. What Britons spoke around 400 AD. In Higham (ed.), 165–71.Google Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolf. 1946. A grammar of Old Irish. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Woolf, Alex. 2007. Apartheid and economics in Anglo-Saxon England. In Higham (ed.), 115–29.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1925. Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar