Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:10:07.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acute accents as graphic markers of vowel quantity in two Late Old English manuscripts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2015

TOMASZ MOKROWIECKI
TOMASZ MOKROWIECKI*
Affiliation:
ul. Partyzantów 30 II / 13, 26-300 Opoczno, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The available standard accounts of Old and Middle English usually assert that scribes paid very little or no attention to vowel quantity. However, a great deal of what has been said so far about quantitative changes in Late Old and Early Middle English is based either on purely theoretical models, or on extremely questionable Modern English data. Surprisingly, except for a few more detailed studies on the peculiar orthography of The Ormulum, little has been done so far to analyse other orthographic systems from this perspective. Furthermore, as has already been shown in earlier studies, vowel quantity of Old and Middle English can be reconstructed to some extent on the basis of orthographic evidence from some manuscripts. Since use of the accent mark by some scribes is often associated with vowel length, the primary aim of the present study is to assess the reliability of the accent marks used in MSS Gg. 3.28 (Homilies of Ælfric) and William H. Scheide (The Blickling Homilies) as potential orthographic indicators of vowel quantity. The results of the analysis clearly show that the accent mark is one of those orthographic notations that can be extremely helpful in establishing vowel quantity in a Late Old English manuscript.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , November 2015 , pp. 407 - 436
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary sources

Gg. 3.28. Homilies of Ælfric (Microfilm reproduction, Cambridge University Library).Google Scholar
William H. Scheide The Blickling homilies (Collection of William H. Scheide, Titusville, Princeton University Library, USA available online at: http://pudl.princeton.edu/objects/x346d4176 (Accessed 18 June 2014).Google Scholar

References

Allen, William S. 1965. Vox Latina: A guide to the pronunciation of classical Latin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Árnason, Kristján. 1980. Quantity in historical phonology: Icelandic and related cases (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bayldon, George. 1870. An elementary grammar of the Old Norse or Icelandic language. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Bischoff, Bernhard. 1990. Latin palaeography: Antiquity and Middle Ages, trans. Croinín, Dábhí Ó & Ganz, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Karl. [1951] 1965. Altenglische Grammatik nach der Angelsächsischen Grammatik von Eduard Sievers. Halle: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Karl. 1965. An outline of Middle English grammar, trans. Johnston, Grahame. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cain, Christopher M. & Russom, Geoffrey (eds.). 2007. Studies in the history of the English language, vol. III: Managing chaos: Strategies for identifying change in English (Topics in English Linguistics 53). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carr, Gerald F., Harbert, Wayne & Zhang, Lihua (eds.). 1999. Interdigitations: Essays for Irmengard Rauch. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Christie, William M. (ed.). 1976. Current progress in historical linguistics. Proceedings of the second International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Tucson, Arizona, 12–16 January 1976. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Clemoes, Peter (ed.). 1997. Ælfric's Catholic homilies: The first series text (EETS SS 17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Albert S. 1884. Vowel-length in King Alfred's Orosius. American Journal of Philology 5 (3), 318–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Albert S. 1885. Vowel-length in Old English. American Journal of Philology 6 (3), 296–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Albert S. 1886. Vowel-length in Old English. American Journal of Philology 7 (1), 79–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, James C. 1896. Introduction to the study of Latin inscriptions. New York: American Book Company.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph H. 1997. English spelling and its relation to sound. American speech 72 (3), 260–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, Jacek. [1968] 2004. A short grammar of Middle English. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Fleming, John V. 1976. The Old English manuscripts in the Scheide Library. The Princeton University Library Chronicle 37 (2), 126–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, Michael. 2006. Sicilicissitat (Plautus, ‘Menaechmi 12’) and early geminate writing in Latin (with an appendix on ‘Men. 13’). Mnemosyne 59 (1), 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulk, Robert D. 1999. Evaluating the evidence for lengthening before homorganic consonant clusters in the Ormulum, In Carr, Harbert & Zhang (eds.), 201–9.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Allan H. 1939. Mock accents in Renaissance and Modern Latin. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 54 (2), 608–10.Google Scholar
Godden, Malcolm (ed.). 1979. Ælfric's Catholic homilies: The second series text (EETS SS. 5). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gollancz, Israel (ed.). 1927. The Cædmon manuscript of Anglo-Saxon biblical poetry: Junius XI in the Bodleian Library. Oxford: British Academy.Google Scholar
Grotans, Anna. 2006. Reading in medieval St Gall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnlaugsson, Guðvarður M. 2007. Manuscripts and palaeography. In McTurk (ed.), 245–64.Google Scholar
Harlow, C. G. 1959. Punctuation in some manuscripts of Ælfric. Review of English Studies 10, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heald, Ann Ridgely Barber. 1965. Some graphic evidence for vowel length in three Old English manuscripts. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, Ann Arbor, University microfilms.Google Scholar
Hicks, Carola (ed.). 1992. England in the eleventh century: Proceedings of the 1990 Harlaxton Symposium (Harlaxton Medieval Studies 2). Stamford: Watkins.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1959. The stressed syllabics of Old English. Language 35 (4), 575–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Edmund. 1900. Outlines of the grammar of Old-Irish. Dublin: The Gaelic League.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. 1992. A grammar of Old English, vol. 1: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. 1996. Old English open syllable lengthening. Transactions of the Philological Society 94 (1), 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. 2002. An introduction to Old English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Holt, Robert (ed.). 1878. The Ormulum. 2 vols. (With the notes and glossary of Dr Robert M. White). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hulme, William H. 1896. Quantity marks in Old-English MSS. Modern Language Notes 11 (1), 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias-Rábade, Luis. 2003. Handbook of Middle English. Munich: LINCOM.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay. H. 2003. Acute vs circumflex: Some notes on PIE and Post-PIE prosodic phonology. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 8, 19–31.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1940. A Modern English grammar on historical principles. Part 1: Sounds and spellings (Photo-typed edition.) Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles. 1989. A history of English phonology. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kahle, Bernhard. 1900. Altisländisches Elementarbuch. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Kaluza, Max. 1906. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache, vol. 1: Geschichte der englischen Sprache: Grundzüge der Phonetik Laut- und Formenlehre des Altenglischen. Berlin: Emil Felber.Google Scholar
Keller, Wolfgang. 1906. Angelsächsische Palaeographie. 2 vols. Berlin: Mayer & Müller.Google Scholar
Keller, Wolfgang. 1908. Über die Akzente in den angelsächsischen Handschriften. Prager deutsche Studien 8, 97–120.Google Scholar
Kelly, Richard J. (ed.). 2003. The Blickling homilies. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kendrick, Thomas D.et al. (eds.). 1956–60. Evangeliorum quattuor Codex Lindisfarnensis: Musei Britannici Codex Cottonianus Nero D. iv. 2 vols. Oltun: Urs Graf.Google Scholar
Ker, Neil R. 1957. Catalogue of manuscripts containing Anglo-Saxon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Suksan. 1967. A phonemic interpretation of the vocalic graphemes of Old English Pastoral Care (MS Hatton 20). PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, University microfilms.Google Scholar
Kim, Suksan. 1971. Diacritical functions of the letter h in Middle English. Journal of English Linguistics 5, 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Anne. 1988. The long and the short of it: Old English spelling and Old English vowels. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 3, 157–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Anne. 1992. Old English ABCs. In Rissanen et al. (eds.), 130–43.Google Scholar
King, Robert D. 1988. A problem of vowel lengthening in Early New High German. Monatshefte 80 (1), 22–31.Google Scholar
Kniezsa, Veronika. 1988. Accents and digraphs in the Peterborough Chronicle. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 21, 15–23.Google Scholar
Krapp, George P. & van Kirk Dobbie, Elliott (eds.). 1931–53. Anglo-Saxon poetic records. 6 vols. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans. 1956. The loss of long consonants and the rise of voiced fricatives in Middle English. Language 32 (3), 435–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Anatoly. 1992. Vowel lengthening before resonant + another consonant and svarabhakti in Germanic. In Rauch, Carr & Kyes (eds.), 163–215.Google Scholar
Liuzza, Roy M. 1996. Orthography and historical linguistics. Journal of English Linguistics 24 (1), 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logeman, Henri. 1889. A sign used in Old-English MSS to indicate vowel-shortness. The Academy 36, 239.Google Scholar
Luick, Karl. 1898. Die Quantitätsveränderungen im Laufe der englischen Sprachentwicklung (Beiträge zur englischen Grammatik III). Anglia 20, 335–62.Google Scholar
Luick, Karl. [1921] 1964. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. 2 vols. Oxford: Blackwell. Leipzig: Tauchnitz.Google Scholar
Mailhammer, Robert. 2007. On syllable cut in the Orrmulum. In Cain & Russom (eds.), 37–61.Google Scholar
Malsch, Derry. 1976. Syllable, mora, and length in the development of English. In Christie (ed.), 83–93.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Angus. 1956. The analysis of written Middle English. Transactions of the Philological Society 55 (1), 26–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McTurk, Rory (ed.). 2007. A companion to Old Norse-Icelandic literature and culture (Blackwell Companions to Literature and Culture 31). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 1982. The environment for open syllable lengthening in Middle English. Folia Linguistica Historica 3 (1), 29–58.Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka & Stockwell, Robert. 1992. Homorganic clusters as moric busters in the history of English: The case of -ld, -nd, -mb. In Rissanen et al. (eds.), 191–206.Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka & Stockwell, Robert. 2008. Phonology: Segmental histories. In Momma & Matto (eds.), 29–42.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce & Robinson, Fred C.. 2011. A guide to Old English, 8th edn.Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mokrowiecki, Tomasz. 2012. Reduplication of consonant graphemes in The Ormulum in the light of Late Old English scribal evidence. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 47 (4), 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momma, Haruko & Matto, Michael (eds.). 2008. A companion to the history of the English language. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, An-Nah. 2004. Constraints on homorganic cluster lengthening in early English: A unified account of vowel lengthening and shortening. Language Research 40 (2), 353–76.Google Scholar
Moore, Samuel. 1919. Historical outlines of English phonology and Middle English grammar. Ann Arbor: George Wahr.Google Scholar
Morris, Richard (ed.). 1880. The Blickling homilies of the tenth century: From the Marquis of Lothian's unique MS. A.D. 971 (EETS, OS. 58, 63, 73). London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Mossé, Fernand. 1952. A handbook of Middle English, trans. Walker, James A.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Robert W. 2000. Syllable cut prosody in Early Middle English. Language 76 (3), 617–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Robert W. 2002. Accents and medieval English phonologists. In Restle & Zaefferer (eds.), 91–120.Google Scholar
Napier, Arthur S. 1889a. A sign used in Old-English MSS to indicate vowel shortness. The Academy 36, 221–22.Google Scholar
Napier, Arthur S. 1889b. A sign used in Old-English MSS to indicate vowel shortness. The Academy 36, 254.Google Scholar
Noreen, Adolf. 1923. Altnordische Grammatik I: Altisländische und Altnorwegische Grammatik, 4th edn.Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
O’Connell, Frederick W. 1912. A grammar of Old Irish. Belfast: Mayne Boyd & Son.Google Scholar
Ó’Cróinín, Dáibhí (ed.). 2005. A new history of Ireland: Prehistoric and early Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Page, Raymond I., Bundy, Mildred & Hadgraft, Nicholas. 1995. Two fragments of an Old English manuscript in the library of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. Speculum 70 (3), 502–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Richard B. 2006. The diachrony and synchrony of vowel quantity in English and Dutch. Diachronica 23 (1), 61–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, Mildred K. 1973. From Latin to Modern French with special consideration of Anglo-Norman phonology and morphology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph & Wrenn, Charles L.. 1957. An Old English grammar, 2nd edn.London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Rask, Erasmus. 1830. A grammar of the Anglo-Saxon tongue, trans. Thorpe, B.. Copenhagen: S. L. Møller.Google Scholar
Rauch, Irmengard, Carr, Gerald F. & Kyes, Robert L. (eds.). 1992. On Germanic linguistics: Issues and methods (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 68). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restle, David & Zaefferer, Dietmar (eds.). 2002. Sounds and systems: Studies in structure and change. A festschrift for Theo Vennemann. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revilo, P. Oliver. 1966. Apex and sicilicus. American Journal of Philology 87 (2), 129–70.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti, Ihalainen, Ossi, Nevalainen, Terttu & Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.). 1992. History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics (Topics in English Linguistics 10). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritt, Nikolaus. 1992. Middle English vowel quantity reconsidered. In Rissanen et al. (eds.), 207–22.Google Scholar
Ritt, Nikolaus. 1994. Quantity adjustment: Vowel lengthening and shortening in Early Middle English (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics: Supplementary volume). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritt, Nikolaus. 2000. Theory, empiry, and textual witnesses: Acutes in the Lindisfarne Gospel and Early English vowel quantity. Sprachwissenschaft 25 (4), 497–512.Google Scholar
Rolfe, John C. 1922. The use of devices for indicating vowel length in Latin. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 61 (1), 80–98.Google Scholar
Rolfe, John C. 1927. Marks of quantity in the Monumentum Antiochenum. The American Journal of Philology 48 (1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Alan S. C. & Stanley, Eric G. (eds.). 1956. The Anglo-Saxon Gloss. In Kendrick et al. (eds.), vol. 2, 25–33.Google Scholar
Russel, Paul. 2005. ‘What was best of every language’: The early history of the Irish language. In Ó’Cróinín (ed.), 405–50.Google Scholar
Sandys, John E. 1913. A companion to Latin studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Lorenz. 1907. Die Akzente in altenglischen Handschriften mit Berücksichtigung der Akzente im Lateinischen und Althochdeutschen. Bonn: Emil Eisele.Google Scholar
Schnur, Rhoda, Moss, Ann, Dust, Philip, Schmidt, Paul, Chomarat, Jacques & Tateo, Francesco (eds.). 1994. Acta conventus Neo-Latini Hafniensis: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress of Neo-Latin Studies, Copenhagen, 12 to 17 August 1991 (Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies 120). Binghamton.Google Scholar
Scragg, Donald G. 1971. Accent marks in the Old English Vercelli Book. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 72, 699–710.Google Scholar
Scragg, Donald G. 1992. Spelling variations in eleventh-century English. In Hicks (ed.), 347–54.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. 1876. Grundzüge der Lautphysiologie: Zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der Indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. 1887. An Old English grammar, 2nd edn, trans. and ed. Cook, Albert S.. Boston: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar
Sisam, Celia. 1951. The scribal tradition of the Lambeth Homilies. Review of English Studies (New Series) 2 (6), 105–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisam, Kenneth. 1931. MSS. Bodley 340 and 342: Ælfric's Catholic Homilies. Review of English Studies 7 (25), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisam, Kenneth. 1932. MSS. Bodley 340 and 342: Ælfric's Catholic Homilies. Review of English Studies 8 (29), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisam, Kenneth. 1933. MSS. Bodley 340 and 342: Ælfric's Catholic Homilies. Review of English Studies 9 (33), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisam, Kenneth. 1953. Studies in the history of Old English literature. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Skeat, Walter W. (ed.). 1892. Twelve facsimiles of Old English manuscripts. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Strang, Barbara M. H. 1970. A history of English. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Steenbakkers, Piet. 1994. Accent-marks in Neo-Latin. In Schnur et al. (eds.), 925–34.Google Scholar
Stevens, John E. 1986. Words and music in the middle ages: Song, narrative, dance, and drama, 1050–1350. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Seiichi. 1982. Phonetic values of Old English vocalic digraphs. Linguistics 20, 323–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1888. A history of English sounds from the earliest period. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Nevalainen, Terttu, Pahta, Päivi & Rissanen, Matti (eds.). 2000. Placing Middle English in context (Topics in English Linguistics 35). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Edward M. 1893. Handbook of Greek and Latin palæography. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward M. 1912. An introduction to Greek and Latin palaeography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thornley, Granville C. 1954. The accents and points of MS. Junius 11. Transactions of the Philological Society 53 (1), 178–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, Benjamin (ed.). 1832. Cædmon's metrical paraphrase of parts of the holy scriptures in Anglo-Saxon. London: The Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar
Thorpe, Benjamin (ed.). 1844–46. The homilies of the Anglo-Saxon church. 2 vols. London: Ælfric Society.Google Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolf. 1909. Handbuch des Alt-Irischen: Grammatik, Texte und Wörterbuch. 2 vols. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague 7.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 2000. From quantity to syllable cuts: On so-called lengthening in the Germanic languages. Rivista di Linguistica 12 (1), 251–82.Google Scholar
Venezky, Richard L. 1965. A study of English spelling-to-sound correspondences on historical principles. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Ward, Ralph L. 1962a. Evidence for the pronunciation of Latin. The Classical World 55 (6), 161–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Ralph L. 1962b. Evidence for the pronunciation of Latin (continued). The Classical World 55 (9), 273–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Benjamin W. 1887. Long vowels and diphthongs in Old Germanic and Old English. Transactions of the American Philological Association (1869–1896) 18, 134–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wełna, Jerzy. 1987. A critical survey of a historical phonology of English vowels (with special reference to Karl Luick's Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Google Scholar
Wełna, Jerzy. 2000. Some remarks on the nonprimary contexts for homorganic lengthening. In Taavitsainen et al. (eds.), 475–87.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph & Wright, Mary E.. 1914. Old English grammar, 2nd edn.London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph & Wright, Mary E.. 1928. An elementary Middle English grammar, 2nd edn.London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar