Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:10:53.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Old English <cg> and its sound correspondences in Old English and Middle English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2019

GJERTRUD F. STENBRENDEN Open the ORCID record for GJERTRUD F. STENBRENDEN [Opens in a new window]
GJERTRUD F. STENBRENDEN*
Affiliation:
Department of Literature, Area Studies, and European Languages, University of Oslo, PO Box 1003, Blindern, 0315 Oslo, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article seeks to identify the phonetic correspondence(s) of the digraph <cg> in Old English (OE) and Middle English (ME), assessing a range of sources: the etyma in early Germanic (Gmc) languages, the various spellings in OE and the spelling evidence in the Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English. Almost all the textbooks on OE claim that <cg> was pronounced /dʒ/, i.e. as a phonemic affricate, in OE. Evidence is thin on the ground, and the argument rests on certain back spellings <cg> for words with etymological <d+g>, e.g. midgern <micgern>. Words with <cg> in OE go back to Gmc *g(g)j, which subsequently underwent palatalisation, and eventually assibilation and affrication. This article argues that the value [ɟj] is more likely for OE and early ME, and that such an interpretation agrees with the available spelling evidence for both OE and ME, in that there is not one <d>-type spelling in the entire historical corpus until late ME. It is also argued that the development of the voiced (pre-)affricate was later than that of its voiceless counterpart, as voiced fricative phonemes are a late, and infrequent, development in Gmc. Moreover, it is likely that the development of /dʒ/ was affected by the high number of French loans with /dʒ/ which entered the English lexicon after 1066. Thus, the English system of consonant phonemes may not have acquired /dʒ/ until the thirteenth century at the earliest.

Keywords

phonologyOld Englishdigraph affricatesME spellings
Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 687 - 718
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Early versions of this article were read at the 52nd International Congress on Medieval Studies (Western Michigan University, 11–14 May 2017) and the 10th International Conference on Middle English (University of Stavanger, 31 May – 2 June 2017). I wish to thank members of the audience for useful feedback. I am also grateful to Michael Benskin, Donka Minkova, Patrick Stiles, the two anonymous reviewers and the editor for reading draft versions of this article and for providing numerous insightful comments and suggestions for improvement. The remaining shortcomings, and views, are entirely my own responsibility.

References

Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Norman (ed.). 1983. Sweet's Anglo-Saxon primer, 9th edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
The Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus, compiled by Healey, Antonette diPaolo with Wilkin, John Price and Xiang, Xin. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project 2009. www.doe.utoronto.ca/pages/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Fulk, Robert D. 2003. Review of Minkova 2003. English Language and Linguistics 7(2), 347–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guion, Susan G. 1998. The role of perception in the sound change of velar palatalization. Phonetica 55, 18–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haugen, Einar. 1976. The Scandinavian languages: An introduction to their history. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Hempl, George. 1899. Old English Ċ, ĊĠ, &c. Anglia 22, 375–83.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. 1992. A grammar of Old English, vol. 1: Phonology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Honeybone, P. 2002. Germanic obstruent lenition: Some mutual implications of theoretical and historical phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Jordan, Richard. 1925. Handbuch der Mittelenglischen Grammatik. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kohler, Klaus J. 1990. German. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 20(1), 48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laing, Margaret. 2008. A Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English. University of Edinburgh. www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laeme2/laeme2.htmlGoogle Scholar
Laker, Stephen. 2003. Review of Minkova 2003. LinguistList 14.2625. http://linguistlist.org/issues/14/14-2625.htmlGoogle Scholar
Laker, Stephen. 2007. Palatalization of velars: A major link of Old English and Old Frisian. In Bremmer, Rolf H. Jr, Laker, Stephen & Vries, Oebele (eds.), Advances in Old Frisian philology (Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 64), 165–84. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1994. Old English: A historical linguistic companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger & Laing, Margaret. 2013. The early Middle English reflexes of Germanic *ik ‘I’: Unpacking the changes. Folia Linguistica Historica 34(1), 93–114.Google Scholar
Luick, Karl. 1914–40. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache, vol. I, parts 1 and 2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiwald, Patrick. 2017. The vocalization of semivowels in Medieval English: A quantitative study. Giessen: Giessener Elektronische Bibliothek.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Angus, Samuels, Michael & Benskin, Michael. 1986. A linguistic atlas of Late Mediaeval English, vols. I–IV. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
MED: The Middle English Dictionary https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionaryGoogle Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 2003. Alliteration and sound change in Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 2014. A historical phonology of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 2016. From stop-fricative clusters to contour segments in Old English. In Chapman, Don, Moore, Colette & Wilcox, Miranda (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language, vol. VII, 29–59. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 2019. Examining the evidence for phonemic affricates: ME /t͡ʃ/, /d͡ʒ/ or [t-ʃ], [d-ʒ]? In Alcorn, Rhona, Kopaczyk, Joanna, Los, Bettelou & Molineaux, Benjamin (eds.), Historical dialectology in the digital age, 156–83. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce & Robinson, Fred C.. 1992. A guide to Old English, 5th edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moulton, William G. 1954. The stops and spirants of Early Germanic. Language 30(1), 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Hans F. 2012. The Germanic roots of the Old English sound system. In Heggedüs, Irén & Fodor, Alexandra (eds.), Historical linguistics 2010: Selected papers from the Sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pecs, 23–27 August 2010, 43–72. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online www.oed.comGoogle Scholar
Pak, Tae-Jong. 1973. Position and affrication in Northumbrian Old English. Neophilologus 57, 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papazian, Erik & Helleland, Botolv. 2005. Norsk talemål. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget.Google Scholar
Penzl, Herbert. 1947. The phonemic split of Germanic k in Old English. Language 23, 34–42. Reprinted in Roger Lass (ed.), 1969. Approaches to English historical linguistics: An anthology, 97–107. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [Page references are to this edition.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, Mildred K. 1934. From Latin to Modern French with especial consideration of Anglo-Norman. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph & Wrenn, C.L.. 1989. An Old English grammar, 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sandøy, Helge. 1991. Norsk dialektkunnskap. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Schmid, Stephan. 2011. An acoustic analysis of palatal obstruents in two Romance varieties. Proceedings from the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1762–5.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. 1968. An Old English grammar, trans. and ed. Cook, Albert S.. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Stiles, Patrick. 2013. The Pan-West Germanic isoglosses and the sub-relationships of West Germanic to other branches. NOWELE 66(1), 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1888. History of English sounds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thorson, Per. 1973. Om regressiv palatalisering av g og k i germansk, serleg i nordisk. In Beito, Olav T. & Hoff, Ingeborg (eds.), Frå norsk målføregranskning, 329–54. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolf. 1961. A grammar of Old Irish, trans. Binchy, D. A. & Bergin, Osborn. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Voronkova, Galina. 1981. Hvislelyder i norsk. In Jahr, Ernst H. & Lorentz, Ove (eds.), Fonologi/Phonology, 259–72. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Waxenberger, Gaby. 2017. The development of the Old English fuþorc. In Waxenberger, Gaby, Sauer, Hans & Kazzazi, Kerstin (eds.), Von der Hieroglyphen zur Internetsprache: Das Verhältnis von Schrift, Laut und Sprache / From hieroglyphs to Internet language: The relation of script, sound and language, 211–47. Wiesbaden: Reichert.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weɫna, Jerzy. 1986. The Old English digraph <cg> again. In Kastovsky, Dieter & Szwedek, Aleksander (eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries, vol. 1: Linguistic theory and historical linguistics, 753–62. Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
White, David L. 2017. Irish influence in the consonantal spellings of Old English. Anglica 26(2), 5–23.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph & Wright, Elizabeth M.. 1925. Old English grammar, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph & Wright, Elizabeth M.. 1928. An elementary Middle English grammar, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wyld, Henry C. 1914. A short history of English. London: John Murray.Google Scholar