Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:47:05.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thirteen good reasons for applying the Rasch model to human data - Trevor G. Bond & Christine M. Fox (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN hardback: 0-8058-3476-1; ISBN paperback 0-8058-4252-7 Price: Australian Price: $59.35 (AUD) $65.28 (AUD) including GST Distribution: DADirect; www.dadirect.com.au; Phone: 61 3 9210 7777; Fax: 61 3 9210 7788 Book website: http://www.jcu.edu.au/∼edtgb

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

Peter Grimbeek
Peter Grimbeek*
Affiliation:
Griffith University

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , 2001 , pp. 81 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1987

References

Babbie, E. (1995). The practice of social research (7th ed.). Place, USA: Wads worth.Google Scholar
Blampied, N. (1999). A legacy neglected: Restating the case for single case research in cognitive-behaviour therapy. Behaviour Change, 16, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimbeek, P. (1999). Reasons for reconsidering quantitative research based on the use of Likert Scale and other Social Science data sets. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 16(2), 89–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J., & Bond, T. (1996). A Rasch analysis of a measure of computer anxiety. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(1), 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. (1993). Getting anxious about electronic learning. Australian Educational Computing, 8(2), 16–20.Google Scholar
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–54.Google Scholar
Micheli, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: Critical history of a methodological concept. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selvin, H.C. (1970). A critique of tests of significance in survey research. In Morrison, D.E. & Henkel, R.E. (Eds.), The significance test controversy (pp. 94–106). Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Simonson, M.R., Maurer, M., Montag-Torardi, M., & Whitaker, M. (1987). Development of a standardized test of computer literacy and a computer anxiety index. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3(2), 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S.S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 667–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). Place, USA: Harper Collins College Publishers.Google Scholar