Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:39:44.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinaesthetic Acuity in Preprimary Children at Risk of Developmental Coordination Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

R. Coleman ,
J.P. Piek  and
D.J. Livesey
R. Coleman*
Affiliation:
Curtin University of Technology
J.P. Piek
Affiliation:
Curtin University of Technology
D.J. Livesey
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney
*
School of Psychology, Curtin University of Technology, PO Box U 1987, Perth, 6001 WA, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The current study examined kinaesthetic acuity and Performance IQ in preprimary children (aged 4-5 years) at risk of Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD; American Psychiatric Association, 1994). Individual assessment of 317 children over four sessions at their pre-primary centre identified 31 children at risk of Developmental Coordination Disorder. These children were matched with 31 control children on age, gender, and Verbal IQ. The two groups were assessed using three Performance IQ subtests of the WPPSI-R and the Kinaesthetic Acuity Test (KAT, Livesey & Parkes, 1995). The results indicate that kinaesthetic acuity and Performance IQ subtests significantly differentiate children at risk of DCD from control children. These results suggest a need to assess the efficacy of kinaesthetic training in young children at risk of DCD. Furthermore, psychologists may be able to assist in the early detection of children at-risk of DCD via the WPPSI-R assessment results routinely obtained for young children.

Keywords

ChildrenDevelopmental Coordination Disorder (DCD)Kinaesthetic SensitivityKinaesthetic AcuityIntelligence TestingMotor CoordinationPreschool Children
Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , May 1997 , pp. 80 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (4th ed.). Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
Ashby, A. A. (1983). Developmental study of short-term characteristics for kinaesthetic movement information. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57,649–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bairstow, P. J., & Laszlo, J. I. (1981). Kinaesthetic sensitivity to passive movements and its relationship to motor development and motor control. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 23, 606–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastian, H. C. (1888). The “muscular sense”: Its nature and cortical localisation. Brain, 10, 1–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, J. M., Connolly, K. J., & Doyle, A. J. R. (1988). Development of kinaesthetic sensitivity and motor performance in children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 30, 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. California: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Gubbay, S. S. (1975).The clumsy child: A study of developmental apraxia and agnosie ataxia. London: W.B. Saunders Company Ltd.Google Scholar
Henderson, S. E. (1993). Motor development and minor handicap. In Kalverboer, A., Hopkins, B., & Geuze, R. (Eds.), Motor development in early and later childhood: Longitudinal approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, A., & Duncombe, L. (1982). Development of kinaesthetic judgements of angle and distance. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 2, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, S. E. & Hall, D. (1982). Concomitants of clumsiness in young school children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 24, 448–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, S. E., & Sugden, D. A. (1992). Movement Assessment Battery for Children. Sidcup, Kent: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovicn.Google Scholar
Larkin, D., & Hoare, D. (1991). The movement approach: A window to understanding the clumsy child. In Summers, J. J. (Ed.), Approaches to the study of motor control and learning (pp. 413–439). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Laszlo, J. I., & Bairstow, P. J. (1980). The measurement of kinaesthetic sensitivity in children and adults. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 22, 454–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laszlo, J.I., & Bairstow, P. J. (1983). Kinaesthesis: Its measurement, training, and relationship to motor control. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 35, 411–421.Google ScholarPubMed
Laszlo, J. I., & Bairstow, P. J. (1985a). Perceptual-motor behavior: Developmental assessment and therapy. London: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Laszlo, J. I., & Bairstow, P. J. (1985b). Kinaesthetic sensitivity test. Perth, WA: Senkit Pty Ltd; London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Laszlo, J. I., & Sainsbury, K. M. (1993). Perceptual-motor development and prevention of clumsiness. Psychologische Forschung, 55, 167–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lezak, M. D. (1983). Neuropsychological Assessment, (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Livesey, D., & Coleman, R. (in press). The development of kinaesthesis and its relationship to motor ability in preschool children. In Piek, J. P. (Ed.), Motor control and human skill: A multidisciplinary perspective. Champagne, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Livesey, D. J. & Intili, D. (1996). A gender difference in visual-spatial ability in four-year-old children: Effects on performance of a kinaesthetic acuity task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 436–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livesey, D. J., & Parkes, N. (1995). Testing kinaesthetic acuity in preschool children. The Australian Journal of Psychology, 47(3), 160–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, R., & Hulme, C. (1987). Kinaesthetic sensitivity of normal and clumsy children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 29, 720–725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, P. B. C. (1982). Where does Sherrington’s “muscular sense” originate? Muscles, joints, corollary discharges? Annual Review of Neurosciences, 5, 189–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCloskey, D. I. (1978). Kinesthetic sensibility. Physiological Reviews, 58, 763-820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orton, S. T. (1937). Reading, writing, and speech problems in children. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Piek, J. P., & Coleman-Carman, R. (1995). Kinaesthetic sensitivity and motor performance in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 37, 976–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sattler, J. M. (1990). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). New York: Jerome Sattler, Publisher.Google Scholar
Stott, D. H., Moyes, F. A., & Henderson, S. E. (1972). Test of motor impairment. Ontario: Brook Educational Publishing.Google Scholar
Stott, D. H., Moyes, F. A., & Henderson, S. E. (1984). Test of motor impairment (2nd ed.). Ontario: Brook Educational Publishing.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. Northridge, CA: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1989). Manual for the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale on Intelligence-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar