Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:18:22.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Adolescents' Friendship Patterns in Middle School: Social–Emotional and Academic Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

Nathan Simmons  and
Ian Hay
Nathan Simmons
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania, Australia.
Ian Hay*
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania, Australia. [email protected]
*
*Address for correspondence: Professor Ian Hay, Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Newnham Campus, Locked Bag 1308, Launceston TAS 7250, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

This research examined the interactions between friendship patterns, school achievement, coping skills, self-concept and the classroom learning environment for 182 early adolescents, mean age 13 years 5 months (47.25% male). Participants completed the Friendship Nomination Form. The second phase of data collection focused on adolescents with high or low friendship ratings, who then completed four social and two academic measures. The social measures were: (1) Friendship Quality Scale (FQS; Bukowski, Hoza, & Boivin, 1994), (2) Self-Description Questionnaire II–Short Form (Marsh, 1990), (3) Coping Strategy Indicator–Short Form (CSI-S; Amirkhan, 1990) and (4) What is Happening in this Classroom Scale (WIHIC; Fraser, Fisher, & McRobbie, 1996). Adolescents with more friends reported more companionship and help from friends. Those with fewer friends perceived their classroom to be less cohesive and less cooperative. Females reported more closeness and friendship commitment than males. Friendship patterns had a significant influence on students' English achievement but not their mathematics achievement. The implications of the findings for school professional are discussed.

Keywords

adolescentsfriendshipcopingself-conceptclassroom learning environmentmathematics and English achievement
Type
Articles
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , 01 December 2010 , pp. 59 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)