Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:51:28.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Classroom Communication of Experienced and Inexperienced Teachers of the Deaf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

R.D. Savage ,
J.F. Savage  and
J. Potter
R.D. Savage*
Affiliation:
Murdoch University
J.F. Savage
Affiliation:
Murdoch University
J. Potter
Affiliation:
Murdoch University
*
Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150
Get access

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to investigate classroom communication by teachers of the deaf. A comparison will be made of the linguistic content of the communication of experienced and inexperienced teachers using total communication methods in a classroom teaching situation. The implications of the teachers' classroom communication methods for children's language development will be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , May 1987 , pp. 17 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Conrad, R. (1979). The deaf school child: Language and cognitive functioning. London:Harper & Row.Google Scholar
DiFrancesca, S. (1972). Academic achievement test results of a national testing program for hearing impaired students — United States. Office of Demographic Studies, Gallaudet College, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Fries, G. (1952). The structure of the English language. New York: Harcourt & Brace.Google Scholar
Goda, S. (1964). Spoken syntax of normal, deaf and retarded adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing, 2, 401–405.Google Scholar
Greene, J. (1975). The written language of senior deaf children. M.Sc. thesis, University of Newcastle on Tyne.Google Scholar
Klopping, H. (1972). Language understanding of deaf students under three auditory-visual stimulus conditions. American Annals of the Deaf, 117, 289–386.Google ScholarPubMed
Llewellyn-Jones, P (1981). Simultaneous interpreting. In Woll, B., Kyle, J., & Deuchar, M. (Eds.), Perspectives on British sign language and deafness. London:Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Marmor, G.S. & Pettito, L. (1979). Simultaneous communication in the classroom. How well is English grammar represented? Sign Language Studies, 23, 99–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, G.W.G. & Lines, M. (1976). Comparison of several single methods of communication with deaf children. Paper presented at seminar on visual com munication held at Northern Counties School for the Deaf, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England.Google Scholar
Moores, D.F. (1970a). An investigation of the psycholinguists functioning of deaf adolescents. Exceptional Children, 36(9), 645–652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moores, D.F (1970b). Psycholinguistics and deafness. American Annals of the Deaf, 115(1), 37–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Moores, D.F (1978). Educating the deaf: Psychology, principles and practices. Chicago:Houghton Miffin.Google Scholar
Myklebust, H.R. (1960). Thy psychology of deafness. New York:Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Savage, R.D., Evans, L. & Savage, J.F (1981). Psychology and communication in deaf children. Sydney:Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Savage, R.D., Savage, J.F., Evans, L. & Potter, J. (1986). Language and reading development in profoundly hearing-impaired children — intelligence, learning and communication factors: A review. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 5(1), 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.A. (1985). Teacher communication in a school for deaf children: An analysis of communication modes, methods and effectiveness. Master of Applied Psychology Dissertation. Murdoch University, Perth.Google Scholar