Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:44:08.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-Assessments of Skills in an Adult Educational and Vocational Guidance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

J A Athanasou*
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
*
Faculty of Education, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007
Get access

Abstract

Self-ranking of results on tests of reading, strength, dexterity, and grip in educational and vocational guidance were compared with test Performance for 49 adults undergoing educational and vocational guidance. Only some self-rankings were significantly correlated with the ranking of the standardised results. There were no influences of age, gender or years of schooling on self-ranking but there were marked inter-individual differences in the accuracy of self-assessment. The results have implications for the use of self-assessment in an educational context.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Athanasou, J.A. (1981). Inter-relationships between self-estimates of aptitudes and tested abilities on the GATE. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED214962).Google Scholar
Athanasou, J.A. (2005). Issues in using self-evaluations in adult education and training. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 45(3), 290303.Google Scholar
Athanasou, J. A. (2006). Work Ability Card Sort. Sydney: University of Technology Sydney.Google Scholar
Athanasou, J. A., & Cooksey, R W. (1993). Self-estimates of vocational interests Australian Psychologist, 28, 118127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duval, S. & Wicklund, R.A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, L. S. (2003). The challenge and promise of cognitive career assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 11,115135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groth-Marnat, G. (2003). Handbook of psychological assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lafayette Instrument (2007). Adult Back and Leg Dynamometer, http://www.lafayetteinstrument.com, Retrieved May 2007.Google Scholar
Mabe, P.A. & West, S.G. (1982). Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 280296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathiowetz, V. (2006). Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength, Occupational Therapy International, 9(3), 201209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W. (1977). On the future of personality measurement. American Psychologist, 32, 246254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prediger, D. J. (2004). Career planning validity of self-estimates and test-estimates of work relevant abilities. The Career Development Quarterly, 52, 202211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrauger, J.S. & Osberg, T.M. (1981). The relative accuracy of self-predictions and judgments by others in psychological assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 322351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, H. A. (1978). Differentiating the contribution of elevation, scatter and shape in profile similarity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38,297308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiffin, J. (1948). Purdue Pegboard. Chicago: Science Research Associates.Google ScholarPubMed
Tousignant, M. & DesMarchais, J.E. (2002). Accuracy of student self-evaluation ability compared to their own performance in a problem-based learning medical program: A correlation study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 7, 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test: Third Edition. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.Google Scholar