Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:50:30.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The makings of a reliable interview with a child witness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

Martine B. Powell  and
Donald M. Thomson
Martine B. Powell*
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Charles Sturt University
Donald M. Thomson
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Charles Sturt University
*
School of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Hwy, BURWOOD Victoria 3125, Phone: 61 3 9244 6106, Fax: 61 3 9244 6858, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper briefly describes four essential elements of interviews involving children, where the primary goal is to obtain detailed and accurate information about an event (e.g., an alleged incident of sexual abuse). These elements include (a) the establishment of a good rapport with the child, (b) a clear description of the purpose and ground-rules of the interview, (c) objectivity and open-mindness, and (d) effective questioning skills. A rationale for the importance of each of these elements and practical recommendations are offered.

Keywords

Child witnessGround-rulesObjectivityOpen-mindednessRapportQuestioning Skills
Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , 2001 , pp. 25 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldridge, M., & Wood, J. (1998). Interviewing children: A guide for child care and forensic practitioners. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M., & Brennan, R. E. (1990). Strange language: Child victims under cross examination (3rd ed.). Wagga Wagga, NSW: Riverina Literacy Centre.Google Scholar
Ceci, S.J., & Bruck, M. (1993). The suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis, Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ceci, S.J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children’s testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, C.B., & Loftus, E. (1987). The memory of children. In Ceci, S.J., Toglia, M.P., & Ross, D.F. (Eds.), Children’s eyewitness memory (pp. 178–208). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, G., Wilson, C., Mitchell, R., & Milsom, J. (1995). Videotaping children’s evidence: An evaluation. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Dent, H. R., & Stephenson, G. M. (1979). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of interviewing child witnesses. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R.P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
Fisher, R.P., Geiselman, R. E., & Raymond, D.S. (1987). Critical analysis of police interview techniques. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15, 177–185.Google Scholar
Goodman, G. S., & Reed, R.S. (1986). Age differences in eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, G.S., Rudy, L., Bottoms, B.L., & Aman, C. (1990). Children’s concerns and memory: Issues of ecological validity in the study of children’s eyewitness testimony. In Fivush, R. & Hudson, J.A. (Eds.), Knowing and remembering in young children (pp. 249–284). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Home Office. (1992). Memorandum of good practice on video recorded interviews with child witnesses for criminal proceedings. London:Department of Health.Google Scholar
Hughes, M., & Grieve, R. (1980). On asking children bizarre questions, First Language, 1, 149–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, M.E., Hershkowitz, I., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P.W., Hovav, M., Manor, T., & Yudilevitch, L. (1996). Effects of investigative utterance types on Israeli children’s responses. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19, 627–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftus, E.F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, K., & Krebs, S. (1986). Techniques for interviewing and evidence gathering. In MacFarlane, K. & Waterman, J. (Eds.), Sexual abuse of young children: Evaluation and treatment (pp. 30–51). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Milne, B., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Moston, S. (1987). The suggestibility of children in interview studies, First Language, 7, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moston, S., Stephenson, G.M., & Williamson, T. (1993). The incidence, antecedents, and consequences of the use of the right to silence during police questioning. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 3, 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, D. A., & Lamb, M.E. (1998). Investigative interviews of children. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Poole, D. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (1995). Interviewing preschoolers: Effect of nonsuggestive techniques, parental coaching, and leading questions on reports of nonexperienced events. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, D. A., & White, L. T. (1991). Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27, 975–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, M. B., & McMeeken, L. (1998). “Tell me about the time when.....”: 9 Golden Rules for interviewing a child about a multiple offence. Australian Police Journal, 52(2), 104–108.Google Scholar
Pratt, C. (1990). On asking children-and adults-bizarre questions. First Language, 10, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sattler, J.M. (1998). Clinical and forensic interviewing of children and families: Guidelines for the mental health, education, pediatric, and child maltreatment fields, San Diego: Sattler Inc.Google Scholar
Saywitz, K. J., & Snyder, L. (1993). Improving children’s testimony with preparation. In Goodman, G.S. & Bottoms, B.L. (Eds), Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony (pp. 117–146). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Siegal, M. (1991). A clash of conversational worlds: Interpreting cognitive development through communication. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J.M., & Teasley, S. O. (Eds.), 3Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 23–40). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, K.J., Lamb, M.E., Hershkowitz, L., Yudillevitch, L., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P.W., & Hovav, M. (1997). Effects of introductory style on children’s abilities to describe experiences of sexual abuse, Child Abuse and Neglect, 21, 1133–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Summit, R.C. (1983). The child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome. Child Abuse and Neglect, 7, 177–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, A., & Westcott, H. (1997). No easy answers: Children’s perspectives on investigative interviews. In Westcott, H. & Jones, J., (Eds.), Perspectives on the memorandum: Policy, practice, and research in investigative interviewing. Arena: Hants.Google Scholar
Walker, A. G. (1994). Handbook on questioning children: A linguistic perspective. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law.Google Scholar
Warren, A., Hulse-Trotter, K., & Tubbs, E.C. (1991). Inducing resistance to suggestibility in children. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J.C. & Pipe, M.E. (1995). The disclosure of secrets during the interviewing of children. In Davies, G. M., Lloyd-Bostock, S., McMurran, M.M., & Wilson, J.C. (Eds.), Psychology and law: Advances in research. Berlin: Wilson, DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. C., & Powell, M. B. (2001). A guide to interviewing children. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar