Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:21:23.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Counselling, Guidance and Clinical Services: “A Therapeutic Pastime For An Age Of Leisure”?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2016

Simon H. Haskell
Simon H. Haskell*
Affiliation:
Victoria College — Burwood Campus
Get access

Extract

Doctors and lawyers have been part of modern Western societies for hundreds of years. But educational psychologists are a much more recent phenomenon in the professions, tracing as they do their heritage only from 1913, when Sir Cyril Burt was appointed by the London County Council as the first educational psychologist in the world! One can only describe the history of such a profession as revolutionary — not evolutionary — since over that 70 years, educational psychologists have come to be employed by every local education authority in Britain and likewise in large numbers in Australia.

In the Education Department of Victoria educational psychologists are employed under the title of Guidance Officers, a rather interesting title. The Counselling Guidance and Clinical Services Branch of the Victorian Education Department is the largest employer of psychologists in Australia: a close estimate suggests some 326 work in this service. The total staff is over 600 and includes social workers, welfare officers, interpreters, speech therapists and a large secretarial, clerical and typist force. In the U.K. with a population of over 56 million and an estimated school age population of 8 million, only 1,300 educational psychologists are employed by the local education authorities.

The comparison between Britain and Victoria in the numbers of educational psychologists employed relative to the number of school children in the two countries is instructive. Victoria has less than 450,000 school age children; it employs over 300 CG & CS officers. This gives a ratio of educational psychologists to schoolchildren of approximately 1:1380 compared to 1:6154 in the U.K. Thus schoolchildren in Victoria would appear to require almost five times as many educational psychologists as the schoolchildren in Britain. Or is it as simple as that? Is the high ratio of educational psychologists in Victoria a reflection of the real needs of Victorian schoolchildren or is it a reflection of the interests (and I use that term in a political self-interest sense) of educational psychologists?

Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , November 1984 , pp. 28 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baken, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423–437.Google Scholar
Box, S. (1977). Hyperactivity: The scandalous silence. New Society Dec., pp. 458–60.Google Scholar
Brynner, J. (1980). Some problems with psychological research practice. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 33, 315–318.Google Scholar
Carrol, H.C.M. (1976). Research and the Educational Psychologist. Association of Educational Psychologists (AEP) Journal, 4, 2.Google Scholar
Carver, R.P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378–399.Google Scholar
Cicourel, A.V. & Kitsuse, J.I. (1963). The Educational decision-makers. New York: Bobbs-Merril.Google Scholar
Clare, A. (1976). Psychiatry in dissent London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
De Santis, G. (1983). Reappraising the professions. Sociology of Health and Illness, 5, 220–228.Google Scholar
Halmos, P. (1965). The faith of the Counsellors. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Hart, D. & Taylor, A. (1980). Dissemination of information in educational psychology. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 33, 282–285.Google Scholar
Levine, M. (1974). Scientific method and the adversary model: Some preliminary thoughts. American Psychologist, 29, 661–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, K. & Murgatroyd, S. (1976). The professionalisation of Counselling in education and its implications. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 4, 2–15.Google Scholar
Macdonald, I. (1981). Assessment: A Social dimension. In Barton, L. and Tomlinson, S. (eds.) Special Education: Policy, Policy, practice and social issues. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Quicke, J. (1977). The psychologist and educational research. Association of Educational Psychologists (A.E.P.) Journal, 4, 4.Google Scholar
Rice, A. (1984). Teachers and Counselling Services in Victoria. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist. 1, 14–17.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (1979). Objections to personal counselling in schools. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 7, 133.Google Scholar
Department of Education & Science (1968). Psychologists in education services. (The Summer-field Report). HMSO.Google Scholar
Schumacher, E.F. (1873). Small is Beautiful. London: Blond & Briggs.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. (1981). The social role of Educational Psychology in the definition of educational subnormality. In Barton, L. & Thomlinson, S. (eds.). Special Education: Policy, practice and social issues. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Thompson, D.A. (1979). Is research a relevant activity for educational psychologists? DECP Occasional Papers, 3, (2) 21–26.Google Scholar
Tizard, J. (1978). Research in special education. Special Education, 23–26.Google Scholar
Wachtel, P.L. (1980). Investigations and its discontents, some constraints on progress in psychological research. American Psychologist, 35, 399–408.Google Scholar
Warnock, H.M. (1978). Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Handicapped Children & Young People. Warnock Report, Cmmd. 7212. HMSO.Google Scholar
Wedell, K. & Lambourne, R. (1980). Psychological services for children in England and Wales. D.E.C.P. Occasional Papers, 4, (1 and 2).Google Scholar