Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:32:49.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sedum ince (Crassulaceae), a new species from Southern Anatolia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2010

H. 'T Hart  and
K. Alpinar
H. 'T Hart
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, the Netherlands.
K. Alpinar
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Istanbul University, 34452 Istanbul, Turkey.
Get access

Abstract

The newly described white-flowered annual Sedum ince closely resembles S. eriocarpum and the annual forms of S. hispemicum (S. longibracteatum), but differs from the former by its alternate instead of verticillate leaves, and from the latter by the 5-merous instead of 6 9-merous flowers and the ripe follicles which are divergent instead of patent and lack the distinct lips along the ventral suture. Molecular phylogenelic analyses indicate that S. ince is but distantly related to S. eriocarpum as well as to S. hispemicum. It belongs to a cytological distinct lineage of Sedum subgenus Gormunia sporting a basic chromosome number of x = 7. Within this lineage, however, S. ince holds a unique position and consequently it is classified in the monotypic S. series Elegans.

Keywords

Chloroplast DNACrassukiceaeflora of Turkeynew speciesSedum
Type
Articles
Information
Edinburgh Journal of Botany , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , July 1999 , pp. 181 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, A. (1930). Crassulaccae. In: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds) Die Natürlkhen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn, 18a: 352–483. Leipzig: Verlag Wilhelm Engclmann.Google Scholar
Boissier, E. (1872). Flora Orientulis, 2. Geneva and Basel: H. Georg.Google Scholar
Böttcher, W. & Jäger, E. J. (1984). Zur Interpretation der Verbreitung der Gattung Sedum L. (Crassulaceae) und ihrer Wuchsformtypen. Wiss. Z. Univ. Halle 33: 127–141.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, D. F. (1972). Sedum L. In: Davis, P. H. (ed.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. 4, pp. 224–243. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fröderström, H. (1932). The genus Sedum L., 3. Acta Horti Gotob. 7. app.: 1–125.Google Scholar
Fröderström, H. (1936). The genus Sedum L., 4. Acta Horti Gotob. 10. app.: 1–262.Google Scholar
Fröderström, H. (1960). edum longibracteatum. In: Rechinger, K. H. Zur Flora von Syrien, Libanon und den angrenzenden türkischen Gebieten. Arkiv Bot. 5: 189–190.Google Scholar
Grisebach, A. (1843). Spieilegium Florae Rumelicae et Bithinieae. 1. Braunschweig.Google Scholar
Kim, J. H., ₼T Hart, H. & Mes, T. H. M. (1996). The phylogenetic position of East Asian Sedum species (Crassulaccae) based on chloroplast DNA trnL(UAA-trnF(GAA) intergenic spacer sequences. Acta Bot. Neerl. 45: 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, R. (1972). The genus Meterostachys Nakai (Crassulaceac). Cat. Succ. J. 44: 262–273.Google Scholar
Ohba, H. (1978). Generic and infrageneric classification of the Old World Sedoideae (Crassulaceae). J. Fac. Sci., Univ. Tokyo, sect. 3, 12: 139–198.Google Scholar
Rechinger, K. H. fil. (1943). Flora Aegaea. Flora der Inscln und Halbinseln des ägäischen Meeres. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. Denkschr. 105: 1–924.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. (1993). Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (PAUP). Version 3.1.1. Champaign, Illinois: Illinois Natural History Survey.Google Scholar
ʼT Hart, H. (1985). Chromosome numbers in Sedum (Crassulaceae) from Greece. Willdenowia 15: 115–135.Google Scholar
ʼT Hart, H. (1991). Evolution and classification of the European Sedum species (Crassulaceae). Flora Medit. 1: 31–61.Google Scholar
ʼT Hart, H. (1995). Infrafamilial and generic classification of the Crassulaceae. In: ʼT Hart, H. & Eggli, U. (eds) Evolution and Systematics of the Crassulaceae, pp. 159–173. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.Google Scholar
ʼT Hart, H. (1996). Variation in Sedum litoreum and the S. rubens complex (Crassulaceae); new names and combinations. Ot Sistematik Botanik Dergisi 2 (1995): 1 10.Google Scholar
ʼT Hart, H. & Alpinar, K. (1991a). Biosystematic studies in Sedum (Crassulaceae) of Turkey. 1. Notes on four hitherto little known species collected in the western part of Anatolia. Willdenowia 21: 143–156.Google Scholar
ʼT Hart, H. & Alpinar, K. (1991b). Biosystematic studies in Sedum (Crassulaceae) of Turkey: Morphological and cytological variation in S. pallidum and 5. rubens. Bot. Chronika 10: 641–649.Google Scholar
ʼT Hart, H. & Eggli, U. (1989). Cytotaxonomic studies in Rosularia (Crassulaceae). Bot. Helv. 98: 223–234.Google Scholar
ʼT Hart, H. & Van Ham, R. C. H. J. (1991). Cytotaxonomic notes on Sedum (Crassulaceae) species of Israel. Israel J. Bot. 40: 323–329.Google Scholar
Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. & Bolvet, J. (1991). Universal primers for amplification of three noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 17: 1105–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uhl, C. H. (1963). Chromosomes and phylogeny of the Crassulaceae. Cad. Succ. J. Amer. 35: 80–84.Google Scholar
Van Ham, R. C. H. J. & ʼT Hart, H. (1998). Phylogenetic relationships in the Crassulaceae inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 123–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Ham, R. C. H. J., ʼT Hart, H., Mes, T. H. M. & Sandbrink, J. M. (1994). Molecular evolution of noncoding regions of the chloroplast genome in the Crassulaceae and related species. Curr. Genet. 25: 558–566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed