Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:48:54.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ianhedgea (Brussicaceae). a new generic name replacing the illegitimate Microsisymbrium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2010

I. A. Al-Shehbaz
Affiliation:
Missouri Botanical Garden, PO Box 299, St Louis, MO 63166–0299, USA.
S. L. O'Kane Jr.
Affiliation:
Biology Department, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614–0421, USA.
Get access

Abstract

The generic name Microsisymbrium O.E. Schulz was illegitimate when described because it included the type of Guillenia Greene. The monotypic Ianhedgea is proposed to include one of the 12 species previously assigned to Microsisymbrium, i.e. M. minutiflorum (Hook.f. & Thomson) O.E. Schulz. The proper generic placement of the remaining 11 species of Microsisymbrium is presented. The following new combinations are made: Ianhedgea minutiflora (Hook.f. & Thomson) Al-Shehbaz & O'Kane, I. minutiflora subsp. brevipedicellata (Hedge) Al-Shehbaz & O'Kane, and Neotorularia quingshuiheense (Ma & Z.Y. Zhu) Al-Shehbaz, O'Kane & G. Yang.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AL-Shehbaz, I. A. (1973). The biosystematics of the genus Thelypodium (Cruciferae). Contr. Gray Herb. 204: 3148.Google Scholar
AL-Shehbaz, I. A. (1985). The genera of Thelypodieae (Cruciferae; Brassicaceae) in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 66: 95111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnet, S. S. R. (1983). Eleven new combinations and one new name for flowering plants. J. Econ. Taxon. Bot. 4: 591593.Google Scholar
Buck, R. E. (1995). Systematics of Caulanthus (Brassicaceae). PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Greene, E. L. (1904). Certain West American Cruciferae. Leaflets Bot. Observ. Crit. 1: 8190.Google Scholar
Greene, E. L. (1906). Four streptanthoid genera. Leaflets Bot. Observ. Crit. 1: 224229.Google Scholar
Hajra, P. K., Chowdhery, H. J. & Das, G. C. (1993). Sisymbrieae. In: Sharma, B. D. & Balakrishnan, N. P. (eds) Fl. India 2: 224247.Google Scholar
Hauser, L. A. & Crovello, T. J. (1982). Numerical analysis of generic relationships in Thelypodieae (Brassicaceae). Syst. Bot. 7: 249268.Google Scholar
Hedge, I. C. (1968). Microsisymbrium. In: Rechinger, K. H. (ed.) Fl. Iran. 57: 318319.Google Scholar
Pay Son, E. B. (1923). A monographic study of Thelypodium and its immediate allies. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 9: 233324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollins, R. C. (1979). Cruciferae. In: Farr, E. R., Leussink, J. A. & Stafleu, F. A. (eds) Index Nominum Genericorum. Regnum Veg. 101.Google Scholar
Rollins, R. C. (1993). The Cruciferae of Continental North America. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schulz, O. E. (1924). Cruciferae-Sisymbrieae. In: Engler, A. (ed.) Planzenr. IV 105 (Heft 86): 1388.Google Scholar
Schulz, O. E. (1927). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Cruciferen des norwestlichen Himalay-Gebirges. Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem 9: 10571095.Google Scholar
Schulz, O. E. (1936). Cruciferae. In: H. Harms (ed.) Natür. Planzenfam. 2nd edition, 17b: 227658.Google Scholar
Soják, J. (1982). Einige Bemerkungen zur Flora der UdSSR (1). Acta Mus. Nat. Prague 38B (1 & 2): 101109.Google Scholar