Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:34:36.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PHYLOGENY OF TWO AFRICAN GENERA OF SAPOTACEAE – ENGLEROPHYTUM AND SYNSEPALUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2019

D. Borg ,
J. E. Richardson ,
D. J. Harris ,
L. Gautier ,
M. Hughes  and
B. Mackinder
D. Borg
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH10 5LR, Scotland, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, England, UK.
J. E. Richardson*
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH10 5LR, Scotland, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Programa de Biología, Universidad del Rosario, Carrera 26 No. 63B – 48, Bogotá, Colombia.
D. J. Harris
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH10 5LR, Scotland, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
L. Gautier
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Plant Systematics and Biodiversity, Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, Case Postale 71, Chambésy, 1292 Geneva, Switzerland.
M. Hughes
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH10 5LR, Scotland, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
B. Mackinder
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH10 5LR, Scotland, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, England, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Englerophytum and Synsepalum are two closely related genera of trees and shrubs from the African tropics. Previous molecular studies have shown that these genera collectively form a clade within the subfamily Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae). However, little is known about the inter-relationships of the taxa within the Englerophytum–Synsepalum clade. In this study, nuclear ribosomal DNA and plastid trnH–psbA sequences were used to estimate the phylogeny within the clade. Results indicate that the clade consists of six major lineages, two composed solely of taxa from the genus Englerophytum and four composed of taxa from the genus Synsepalum. Each lineage can be distinguished by suites of vegetative and floral characters. Leaf venation patterns, calyx fusion, style length and staminodal structure were among the most useful characters for distinguishing clades. Some of the subclades within the Englerophytum–Synsepalum clade were also found to closely fit descriptions of former genera, most of which were described by Aubréville, that have since been placed in synonymy with Englerophytum and Synsepalum. The clade with the type species of Englerophytum also contains the type species of the genera Wildemaniodoxa and Zeyherella, which are confirmed as synonyms.

Keywords

AfricaEnglerophytummorphologyphylogenySapotaceaeSynsepalum
Type
Articles
Information
Edinburgh Journal of Botany , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , July 2019 , pp. 231 - 267
Copyright
© Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (2019) 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, K. E. (2010). Systematics and biogeography of the pantropical genus Manilkara (Sapotaceae). Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Aubréville, A. (1959). La Flore Forestière de la Côte d’Ivoire. Nogent-sur-Marne: Centre Technique Forestier Tropical.Google Scholar
Aubréville, A. (1961a). Notes sur les Sapotacées de l’Afrique équatoriale. Notul. Syst. (Paris) 16: 223–279.Google Scholar
Aubréville, A. (1961b). Flore Du Gabon. Monograph 1. Sapotaceés. Paris: Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle.Google Scholar
Aubréville, A. (1964a). Sapotacées: taxonomie et phytogéographie. Adansonia 1: 1–157.Google Scholar
Aubréville, A. (1964b). Flore du Caméroun. Monograph 2. Sapotaceés. Paris: Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle.Google Scholar
Aubréville, A. (1965). Notes sur des Sapotacées australiennes. Adansonia n.s. 5: 21.Google Scholar
Aubréville, A. & Pellegrin, F. (1934). De quelques Sapotacées de la Cote d’Ivoire. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 81: 792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubréville, A. & Pellegrin, F. (1958). Réhabilitation de deux genres de Sapotacées. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 105: 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubréville, A. & Pellegrin, F. (1959). Rectification au sujet de Sapotacées africaines. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 106: 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baehni, C. (1965). Mémoires sur les Sapotacées 3. Inventaire des genres. Boissiera 11: 1–262.Google Scholar
Bartish, I. V., Swenson, U., Munzinger, J. & Anderberg, A. A. (2005). Phylogenetic relationships among New Caledonian Sapotaceae (Ericales): molecular evidence for generic polyphyly and repeated dispersal. Amer. J. Bot. 92(4): 667–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartish, I. V., Antonelli, A., Richardson, J. E. & Swenson, U. (2011). Vicariance or long-distance dispersal: historical biogeography of the pantropical subfamily Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae). J. Biogeogr. 38(1): 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, A. (1943). A propos de la nomenclature de quelqes Sapotaceés africaines. Rev. Bot. Appl. Agric. Trop. 23: 282–294.Google Scholar
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. (2012). jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature, Meth. 9(8): 772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Wildeman, E. A. J. (1919). Sur quelques espéces congolaises de la famille des Sapotacées. Rev. Zool. Bot. Africaines 7(Suppl): 21.Google Scholar
Engler, A. (1904). Sapotaceae africanae. In: Engler, A. Monographieen Afrikanisher Pflanzen-Familien und -Gattungen, Volume 8, Sapotaceae, pp. 32–33. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
Gautier, L., Lachenaud, O., van der Burgt, X. & Kenfack, D. (2016). Five new species of Englerophytum K. Krause (Sapotaceae) from central Africa. Candollea 71(2): 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govaerts, R., Frodin, D. G. & Pennington, T. D. (2001). World Checklist and Bibliography of Sapotaceae. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Hall, T. A. (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 95–98.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. B. (1999). Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation. Molec. Ecol. 8(3): 521–523.Google ScholarPubMed
Hawthorne, W. D. (2014). A new, endangered species of canopy tree from the evergreen forests of Ghana and Liberia, Synsepalum ntimii (Sapotaceae). Pl. Ecol. Evol. 147(1): 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawthorne, W. D. & Jongkind, C. C. H. (2006). Woody Plants of Western African Forests: a Guide to the Forest Trees, Shrubs and Lianes from Senegal to Ghana. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Heine, H. & Hemsley, J. H. (1960). Notes on African Sapotaceae II. The genus Bequaertiodendron De Wild. Kew Bull. 14: 304–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsley, J. H. (1968). Sapotaceae. In: Flora of Tropical East Africa, 78 pp. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Krause, K. (1914). Englerophytum, eine neue afrikanische gattung der Sapotaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 50(Suppl.): 343–348.Google Scholar
Kupicha, F. K. (1978). Notes on East African Sapotaceae. Candollea 33: 29.Google Scholar
Lecomte, M. H. (1928). Deux Sapotacées nouvelles de Madagascar et d’Afrique. Bull. Mus. Natl Hist. Nat. 34: 355–356.Google Scholar
Liben, L. (1989). La véritable identité des genres et espèces confondus sous le nom de “Bequaertiodendron magalismontanum” (Sond.) Heine & Hemsley (Sapotaceae) en Afrique centrale et occidentale. Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belg. 59(1/2): 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. (2011). Mesquite: a Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis, Version 2.75. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Meeuse, A. D. J. (1960). Notes on the Sapotaceae of Southern Africa. Bothalia 71(2): 317–379.Google Scholar
Möller, M. & Cronk, Q. C. B. (1997). Origin and relationships of Saintpaulia (Gesneriaceae) based on ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 84(7): 956–965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, S. (1907). Alabastra Diversa– Part XIV – New or little known African gamopetalae. J. Bot., Brit. Foreign 45: 41–53.Google Scholar
Pennington, T. D. (1991). The Genera of the Sapotaceae. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
Pierre, J. B. L. (1890). Notes Botaniques: Sapotacées. Paris: Librairie des Sciences naturelles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A. J. (2009). Tracer v.1.5. Online. Available: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer (accessed August 2013).Google Scholar
Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19(12): 1572–1574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, J., Lickey, E. B., Beck, J. T., Farmer, S. B., Liu, W., Miller, J., Siripun, K. C., Winder, C. T., Schilling, E. E. & Small, R. L. (2005). The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Amer. J. Bot. 92(1): 142–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, M. P. & Ochoterena, H. (2000). Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49(2): 369–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swenson, U. & Anderberg, A. A. (2005). Phylogeny, character evolution, and classification of Sapotaceae (Ericales). Cladistics 21(2): 101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenson, U., Richardson, J. E. & Bartish, I. V. (2008). Multi-gene phylogeny of the pantropical subfamily Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae): evidence of generic polyphyly and extensive morphological homoplasy. Cladistics 24(6): 1006–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D. L. (2003). PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl. Acids Res. 22(22): 4673–4680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, T. J., Burns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis, M., Gelfand, D., Sninsky, J., and White, T. (eds) PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications, pp. 315–322. San Diego, California: California Academic Press.Google Scholar
WCSP (2013). World Checklist of Sapotaceae. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Online. Available: http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/ (accessed August 2013).Google Scholar