Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:44:22.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A RESPONSE TO BRUNI AND SUGDEN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

Julie A. Nelson
Julie A. Nelson*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Boston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An article by Luigino Bruni and Robert Sugden published in this journal argues that market relations contain elements of what they call ‘fraternity’. This Response demonstrates that my own views on interpersonal relations and markets – which originated in the feminist analysis of caring labour – are far closer to Bruni and Sugden's than they acknowledge in their article, and goes on to discuss additional important dimensions of sociality that they neglect.

Type
Discussion
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , July 2009 , pp. 187 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bruni, L. and Sugden, R. 2008. Fraternity: Why the market need not be a morally free zone. Economics and Philosophy 24: 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folbre, N. and Nelson, J. A. 2000. For love or money – Or both? Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: 123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folbre, N. and Nelson, J. A.. 2006. Why a well-paid nurse is a better nurse. Nursing Economics 24: 127–30.Google Scholar
Frey, B. 1997. Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.Google Scholar
Frey, B. 1998. Institutions and morale: The crowding-out effect. In Economics, Values, and Organization, ed. Ben-Ner, A. and Putterman, L., 437–60. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J. A. 1998. Labor, gender, and the economic/social divide. International Labor Review 137: 33–46.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. A. 2003. Separative and soluble firms: Androcentric bias in business ethics. In Feminist Economics Today: Beyond Economic Man, ed. Ferber, M. A. and Nelson, J. A., 81–99. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. A. 2005. Interpersonal relations and economics: Comments from a feminist perspective. In Economics and Social Interaction: Accounting for Interpersonal Relationships, ed. Gui, B. and Sugden, R., 250–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J. A. 2006a. Can we talk? Feminist economists in dialogue with social theorists. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 31: 1052–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J. A. 2006b. Economics for Humans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J. A. and England, P.. 2002. Feminist philosophies of love and work. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 17 (2): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L.. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 54–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M. and Deci, E. L.. 2004. Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87: 246–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed