Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:10:51.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Punishment and disagreement in the state of nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2019

Jacob Barrett*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Arizona, 213 Social Sciences Building, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA

Abstract

Hobbes believed that the state of nature would be a war of all against all. Locke denied this, but acknowledged that in the absence of government, peace is insecure. In this paper, I analyse both accounts of the state of nature through the lens of classical and experimental game theory, drawing especially on evidence concerning the effects of punishment in public goods games. My analysis suggests that we need government not to keep wicked or relentlessly self-interested individuals in line, but rather to maintain peace among those who disagree about morality.

Type
Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashcraft, R. 1968. Locke’s state of nature: historical fact or moral fiction? American Political Science Review 62, 898915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R. 2006. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google ScholarPubMed
Baldassari, D. and Grossman, G. 2011. Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108, 1102311027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. and Gaus, G. Forthcoming. Laws, norms, and public justification: the limits of law as an instrument of reform. In Public Reason and the Courts, eds Langvatn, S.A., Sadurski, W. and Kumm, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., Gintis, H. and Bowles, S. 2010. Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science 328, 617620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, J.P. 2018. Locke, Nozick and the state of nature. Philosophical Studies Online First, 122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1201-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, A. 2011. Sustaining cooperation in laboratory experiments: a selective survey of the literature. Experimental Economics 14, 4783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, H. 2015. Hobbes’s state of nature: a modern Bayesian game-theoretic analysis. Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1, 485508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinyabuguma, M., Page, T. and Putterman, L. 2006. Can second-order punishment deter perverse punishment? Experimental Economics 9, 265279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colman, J. 1983. John Locke’s Moral Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Denant-Boemont, L., Masclet, D. and Noussair, C.N. 2007. Punishment, counterpunishment and sanction enforcement in a social dilemma experiment. Economic Theory 33, 145167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeScioli, P. 2016. The side-taking hypothesis for moral judgment. Current Opinion in Psychology 7, 2327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, G.G. and Shoemaker, D.W. 2002. Why we can’t all just get along: human variety and game theory in Hobbes’s state of nature. Southern Journal of Philosophy 40, 345374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egas, M. and Riedl, A. 2008. The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275, 871878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. 2000. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 90, 980994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. 2002. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S. and Fehr, E. 2001. Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economic Letters 71, 397404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaus, G. 2018. Locke’s liberal theory of public reason. In Public Reason in Political Philosophy, eds Turner, P.N. and Gaus, G., 163183. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D.P. 1986. The Logic of Leviathan. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grechenig, K., Nicklisch, A. and Thöni, C 2010. Punishment despite reasonable doubt – a public goods experiment with sanctions under uncertainty. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 7, 847867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, G.K. and Weingast, B.R. 2013. Law without the state: legal attributes and the coordination of decentralized collective punishment. Journal of Law and Courts 1, 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, J. 1986. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hermann, B., Thöni, C. and Gächter, S. 2008. Antisocial punishment across societies. Science 319, 13621367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1994 [1651]. Leviathan, ed. Curley, E.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hopfensitz, A. and Reuben, E. 2009. The importance of emotions for the effectiveness of social punishment. Economic Journal 119, 15341559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavka, G.S. 1986. Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kingsley, D.C. 2016. Endowment heterogeneity and peer punishment in a public good experiment: cooperation and normative conflict. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 60, 4961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogelmann, B. and Ogden, B.G. 2018. Enough and as good: a formal model of Lockean first appropriation. American Journal of Political Science 62, 682694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, J.O. 1995. Public goods: some experimental results. In Handbook of Experimental Economics, eds Kagel, J. and Roth, A., 111193. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S.A. 2009. Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. 1975 [1690]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P.H.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1980 [1690]. Second Treatise of Government, ed. Macpherson, C.B.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1983 [1689]. A Letter Concerning Toleration, ed. Tully, J.H.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1997 [1692]. Ethica A. In Locke: Political Essays, ed. Goldie, M., 318319. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, C.B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nikiforakis, N. 2008. Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: can we really govern ourselves? Journal of Public Economics 92, 91112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikiforakis, N., Noussair, C.N. and Wilkening, T. 2012. Normative conflicts and feuds: the limits of self-enforcement. Journal of Public Economics 96, 797807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Walker, J. and Gardner, R.. 1992. Covenants with and without a sword: self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review 86, 404417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, G. 1978. John Locke. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sheridan, P. 2007. Pirates, kings and reasons to act: moral motivation and the role of sanctions in Locke’s moral theory. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37, 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A.J. 1989. Locke’s state of nature. Political Theory 17, 449470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A.J. 1991. Locke and the right to punish. Philosophy & Public Affairs 20, 311349.Google Scholar
Tyler, T.R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Vallier, K. 2018. Public justification. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E.N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justification-public/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderschraaf, P. 2006. War or peace? A dynamical analysis of anarchy. Economics and Philosophy 22, 243279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar