Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:00:02.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Money and Value: On The Ethics and Economics of Finance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2009

Amartya Sen
Amartya Sen
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I feel deeply honored and privileged to have the opportunity of giving the first Baffi Lecture at the Bank of Italy. Paolo Baffi was not only a distinguished banker and financial expert, he was also a remarkable economist and a visionary social thinker. He had outstanding technical expertise in many different fields, but combined his intellectual eminence with a profound sense of values. As Governor Ciampi put it at the general meeting of the Bank of Italy last May, Paolo Baffi represented “an extraordinary combination of penetrating logic, erudition and moral strength … [he was] not only a gifted student of economics, he had a deep-seated commitment to act for the common good.”1 In remembering Baffi today, we must keep in mind both his intellectual contributions and his general evaluative concerns.

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , October 1993 , pp. 203 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akerlof, G. 1983. “Loyalty Filters.” American Economic Review 73:54–63.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. 1984. An Economic Theorist's Book of Tales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali Khan, M. 1990. “Distributive Justice and Need Fulfillment in an Islamic Economy: A Review.” Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, mimeograph.Google Scholar
Aoki, M. 1989. Information, Incentive and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Translated by Ross, W.D.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Aristotle, The Politics. Translated by Translated by Lord, C.Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J., and Hahn, F. H.. 1971. General Competitive Analysis San Francisco: HoldenDay. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1979.Google Scholar
Baffi, P. 1985. “The Bank of Italy and Foreign Economists 1944–53: A Personal Memoir.” Rivista di Storia Economica 2: 1–40.Google Scholar
Barker, E. 1959. The Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. 1789. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: Payne. Oxford: Blackwell, 1948.Google Scholar
Bentham, J.. 1790. Defence of Usury. London: Payne.Google Scholar
Bernal, J. D. 1954. Science in History, Vol. 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. H., and Skinner, A. S., eds. (1976). Adam Smith: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Clark, R. C. 1986. Corporate Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of Value. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dobb, M. H. 1937. “The Requirements of a Theory of Value.” In Political Economy and Capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dore, R. 1987. Taking japan Seriously: A Confucian Perspective on Leading Economic Issues. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fumagalli, A. 1990. “State and Market: What Rules?” Presidential Address to the Young Entrepreneurs, Capri, September 21–22.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. H. 1982. Money and Inflation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. H. 1985. Money, Growth and Stability. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1788. Kritik der Praktischen Vernunft. Translated into English by Translated by Abbott, T. K. under the title Kant's Critic of Practical Reason. London: Longmans, 1909.Google Scholar
Kautilya, Arthaśāstra. Translated by Shama Sastry, R.. Mysore: Mysore Printing and Publishing House, 1967.Google Scholar
Kay, J. 1988. “Discussion.” Economic Policy April.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1930. A Treatise on Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P. 1984. A Financial History of Western Europe. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
King, M., and A., Roell. 1988. “Insider Trading.” Economic Policy. April.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, T. C. 1957. Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Landes, D. S. 1958. Bankers and Pashas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Langholm, O. 1984. The Aristotelian Analysis of Usury. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget As.Google Scholar
Lord, C. 1984. Aristotle: The Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Maimonides, M. Code of Maimonides. Book 13: Book of Civil Laws. Translated by rabinowitz, J. J., New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1887. Capital, Vol. 1. Translated by S., Moore and E., Aveling. London: Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. 1982. Why Has japan “Succeeded”?: Western Technology and Japanese Ethos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. 1979. Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1980. “The Limits of Objectivity.” In Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 1, edited by McMurrin, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Naqvi, S. N. H., and A., Qadir. 1986. A Model of a Dynamic Islamic Economy and the Institution of Interest. Islamabad: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.Google Scholar
Nelson, B. N. 1949. The Idea of Usury. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Noonan, J. T. Jr 1957. Scholastic Analysis of Usury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, J. J. (translator). 1949. The Code of Maimonides: Book Thirteen. The Book of Civil Laivs. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1952. The Rate of Interest and Other Essays. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ross, D. 1980. Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics. The World's Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E. 1992. “Adam Smith and Conservative Economics.” The Economic History Review 45:74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1982a. Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Oxford: Blackwell. Italian translation with Introduction by S. Zamagni under the title Scelta, benesse, equita. Bologna: II Mulino, 1986.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1982b. “Rights and Agency.” Philosophy and Public Affairs. 11:3–39; reprinted in S., Scheffler, ed., Consequentialism and Its Critics: Oxford Readings in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1983. “Evaluator Relativity and Consequential Evaluation.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12:113–132.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1985a. “Well-being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984.” Journal of Philosophy 82:169–221.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1985b. “The Moral Standing of the Market.” Social Philosophy and Policy 2:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shama Sastry, R. (translator). 1967. Kautilya's Arthaiastra. Mysore: Mysore Printing and Publishing House.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C., and Williams, B. A. O.. 1973. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, H. W. 1987. “Usury.” In The Nezv Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 4, edited by Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newman, P.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tamari, M. 1987. “With All Your Possessions”: Jewish Ethics and Economic Life. New York:Free Press.Google Scholar
Werhane, P. H. 1991. Adam Smith and His Legacy for Modern Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. A. O. 1973. “A Critique of Utilitarianism." In Smart and Williams (1973).Google Scholar