Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T06:46:50.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Limits of the Numerical: The Abuses and Uses of Quantification, ed. C. Newfield, A. Alexandrova and S. John. University of Chicago Press, 2022, 317 pages.

Review products

Limits of the Numerical: The Abuses and Uses of Quantification, ed. C. Newfield, A. Alexandrova and S. John. University of Chicago Press, 2022, 317 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2023

Kate Vredenburgh Open the ORCID record for Kate Vredenburgh [Opens in a new window]
Kate Vredenburgh*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Economics & Philosophy , First View , pp. 1 - 6
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babic, B. and Cohen, I.G. 2023. The explainability bait and switch. Minnesota Law Review. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Citron, D. and Pasquale, F. 2014. The scored society: due process for automated predictions. Washington Law Review 89, 1–32.Google Scholar
Cohen, G.A. 1997. Where the action is: on the site of distributive justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 26, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordelli, C. 2020. The Privatized State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, H. 2016. Values in science. In Oxford Handbook in the Philosophy of Science, ed. Humphreys, P., 609–630. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fourcade, M. and Healey, K. 2013. Classification situations: life-chances in the neoliberal era. Accounting, Organizations, and Society 38, 559–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, F. 2007. How to do things with experimental economics. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, ed. Mackenzie, D., Muniesa, F. and Leung-Sea, S., 128–162. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 2014. A Market Failures Approach to Business Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, I., Medina, J. and Pohlhaus, G. Jr, eds. 2017. The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiviat, B. 2019. The art of deciding from data: Evidence from how employers translate credit reports into hiring decisions. Socio-Economic Review 17, 283–309.Google Scholar
Longino, H.E. 1995. Gender, politics, and the theoretical virtues. Synthese 104, 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, H.E. 1996. Cognitive and non-cognitive values in science: rethinking the dichotomy. In Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, eds. Hankinson Nelson, L. and Nelson, J., 39–58. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D. 2006. An Engine Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclure, J. 2021. AI, explainability, and public reason: the argument from the limitations of the human mind. Minds and Machines 31, 421–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijer A. 2014. Transparency. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, ed. M. Bovens, R. Goodin and T. Schillemans, 507–524. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moss, P. and Tilly, C. 2001. Stories Employers Tell: Race, Skill, and Hiring in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Moulton, L. 2007. Divining value with relational proxies: how moneylenders balance risk and trust in the quest for good borrowers. Sociological Forum 22, 300–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, C.T. 2022. Transparency is surveillance. Philosophy and Phenomenological Review 105, 331–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vredenburgh, K. 2022. The right to explanation. Journal of Political Philosophy 30, 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. 2016. Political Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacka, B. 2017. When the State Meets the Street: Public Service and Moral Agency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar