Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:00:30.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Health, Luck, and Justice, Shlomi Segall. Princeton University Press, 2010. x + 239 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2011

Daniel M. Hausman*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, E. 1999. What is the point of equality? Ethics 109: 287337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1989. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99: 906944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1981. What is equality? Part II: equality of resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs 10: 283345.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 2000. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. 2008. Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. and McPherson, M.. 2006. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. and Sensat Waldren, M.. forthcoming. Egalitarianism reconsidered. Journal of Moral Philosophy.Google Scholar
Kagan, S. 1999. Equality and desert. In What Do We Deserve: A Reader on Justice and Desert, ed. Pojman, L. and McLeod, O.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Legrand, J. 1990. Equity and Choice: An Essay in Economics and Applied Philosophy. London: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Miller, D. 1982. Arguments for equality. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7: 7387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, M. 2008. What should egalitarians believe? Philosophy & Public Affairs 36: 119156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandbu, M. 2004. On Dworkin's brute-luck–option-luck distinction and the consistency of brute-luck egalitarianism. Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 3: 283312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. 2003. The diversity of objections to inequality. In The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy, 202218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemplowska, Z. 2009. Making justice sensitive to responsibility. Political Studies 57: 237259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, L. 1993. Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, L. 2003. Egalitarianism defended. Ethics 113: 764782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar