Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:01:12.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE CORPORATION'S GOVERNMENTAL PROVENANCE AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2018

Abraham A. Singer
Abraham A. Singer*
Affiliation:
Loyola University Chicago, Department of Management, Quinlan School of Business, 820 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago IL 60611USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Corporations cannot exist, scholars rightly note, without being constituted by government. However, many take a further step, claiming that corporations are normatively distinct from other market actors because of this governmental provenance. They are mistaken. Like corporations, markets and contracts also require government for their creation. Governmental provenance does not distinguish corporations normatively because our coercive social institutions are pro tanto justified in re-arranging both corporate and non-corporate market activities on behalf of social and political values. The corporation is distinct only practically and prudentially, in that it represents a more proximate instrument for effecting morality in the economy.

Keywords

Political Theory of the CorporationGovernmental ProvenanceNexus of ContractsTransaction CostsPublic and Private
Type
Article
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , July 2019 , pp. 283 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, E. 2017. Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don't Talk about It). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bakan, J. 2004. The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Power and Profit. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Blanc, S. 2016. Are Rawlsian considerations of corporate governance illiberal? A reply to Singer. Business Ethics Quarterly 26 (3): 407–421.Google Scholar
Blanc, S. and Al-Amoudi, I.. 2013. Corporate institutions in a weakened welfare state: a Rawlsian perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (4): 497–525.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1962. Economic Theory in Retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boatright, J. 2013. Review of Public Capitalism: The Political Authority of Corporate Executives, by Christopher McMahon. Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (3): 477–480.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. 1977. The Visible Hand. New York, NY: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Ciepley, D. 2013 a. Beyond public and private: toward a political theory of the corporation. American Political Science Review 107 (1): 139–158.Google Scholar
Ciepley, D. 2013 b. Neither persons nor associations: against constitutional rights for corporations. Journal of Law and Courts 1 (2): 221–245.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. 1985. A Preface to Economic Democracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. W.. 1994. Toward a unified conception of business ethics: integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review 19 (2): 252–284.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. W.. 1999. Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Doppelt, G. 1981. Rawls’ system of justice: a critique from the left. Noûs 15 (3): 259–307.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1984 [1893]. The Division of Labor in Society, trans. W.D. Halls. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ferreras, I. 2017. Firms as Political Entities: Saving Democracy Through Economic Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graeber, D. 2011. Debt: The First 5000 Years. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House Publishing.Google Scholar
Greenfield, K. 2008. The Failure of Corporate Law: Fundamental Flaws and Progressive Possibilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A. and Thornton, D.. 2004. Social license and environmental protection: why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry 29 (2): 307–341.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R.. 2004. What is corporate law? In The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach, ed. Kraakman, R., Davies, P., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H. and Rock, E., 5–15. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 2013. Morality, Competition and the Firm: The Market Failures Approach to Business Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackall, R. 1988. Moral Mazes: Bureaucracy and Managerial Work. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kamar, E., Karaca-Mandic, P. and Talley, E.. 2009. Going-private decisions and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: a cross-country analysis. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 25 (1): 107–133.Google Scholar
Landemore, H. and Ferreras, I.. 2016. Toward a justification of the firm/state analogy: in defense of workplace democracy. Political Theory 44 (1): 53–81.Google Scholar
Malleson, T. 2013. Making the case for workplace democracy: exit and voice as mechanisms of freedom in social life. Polity 45 (4): 604–629.Google Scholar
Martin, D. 2013. The contained-rivalry requirement and a ‘triple feature’ program for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 115 (1): 167–182.Google Scholar
Martins, N. O. 2016. Justice and the social ontology of the corporation. Journal of Business Ethics. OnlineFirst, <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3360-y>..>Google Scholar
Matten, D. and Crane, A.. 2005. What is stakeholder democracy? Perspectives and issues. Business Ethics: A European Review 14 (1): 6–13.Google Scholar
Matten, D. and Moon, J.. 2008. 'Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 33 (2): 404–424.Google Scholar
McMahon, C. 1981. Morality and the invisible hand. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (3): 247–277.Google Scholar
McMahon, C. 2012. Public Capitalism: The Political Authority of Corporate Executives. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. 2005. Economists and the economy in the twentieth century. In The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and its Epistemological Others, ed. Chapel Hill, G. Steinmetz.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. 2008. Rethinking economy. Geoforum 39 (3): 1116–1121.Google Scholar
Moriarty, J. 2012. Justice in compensation: a defense. Business Ethics: A European Review 21 (1): 64–76.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, J. 2011. Law's Relations: A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neron, P.-Y. 2015. Rethinking the very idea of egalitarian markets and corporations: why relationships might matter more than distribution. Business Ethics Quarterly 25 (1): 93–124.Google Scholar
Nielsen, A. E. 2013. License to operate. In Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility, ed. Idowu, S. O., Capaldi, N., , L. Zu and Das Gupta, A., 1585–1591. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Norman, W. 2011. Business ethics as self-regulation: why principles that ground regulations should be used to ground beyond-compliance norms as well. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (1): 43–57.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. 2001 [1944]. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1977. The basic structure as subject. American Philosophical Quarterly 14: 159– 165.Google Scholar
Ribstein, L. E. 2010. The Rise of the Uncorporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shipman, A. 1999. The Market Revolution and Its Limits: A Price for Everything. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Singer, A. 2015. There is now Rawlsian theory of corporate governance. Business Ethics Quarterly 25 (1): 65–92.Google Scholar
Singer, A. A. 2018 a. Rawls well that ends well: a response to Welch and Ly. Business Ethics Journal Review 6 (3): 11–17.Google Scholar
Singer, A. A. 2018 b. The Form of the Firm: A Normative Political Theory of the Corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, A. A. 2018 c. The political nature of the firm and the cost of norms. Journal of Politics. <https://doi.org/10.1086/697122>..>Google Scholar
Smith, J. 2017. Why justice matters for business ethics. Business Ethics Journal Review 5 (3): 15–21.Google Scholar
Welch, T. and Ly, M.. 2017. Rawls on the justice of corporate governance. Business Ethics Journal Review 5 (2): 7–14.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1988. Corporate finance and corporate governance. Journal of Finance 43 (3): 567–591.Google Scholar