Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T08:16:15.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CAPITAL WITHOUT WAGE-LABOUR: MARX’S MODES OF SUBSUMPTION REVISITED

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2017

Nicholas Vrousalis
Nicholas Vrousalis*
Affiliation:
Institute of Political Science, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333AK Leiden, the Netherlands. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This paper argues that capitalist social relations do not presuppose wage-labour. The paper defends a functional definition of the capitalist relations of production, in terms of what Marx calls the ’subsumption of labour by capital’. I argue that there are at least four modes of subsumption, one transitional to and one transitional from the capitalist mode of production. Unlike the capitalist mode of production, capitalist relations of production are compatible with the absence of a labour market, and even with the absence of workplace authority relations. The ambit of capitalist domination is therefore broader than typically thought.

Keywords

exploitation theoryhistorical materialismMarxismvalue-form theoryagrarian capitalism
Type
Symposium Article
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 34 , Special Issue 3: Exploitation , November 2018 , pp. 411 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banaji, J. 1975. India and the colonial mode of production: comment. Economic and Political Weekly 10 (49): 1887–1889, 1891–1892.Google Scholar
Banaji, J. 2010. Theory as History. London: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Bhandari, R. 2008. The disguises of wage-labour: juridical illusions, unfree conditions and novel extensions. Historical Materialism 16: 71–99.Google Scholar
Brenner, R. 1976. Agrarian class structure and economic development in pre-industrial Europe. Past and Present 70: 30–75.Google Scholar
Brenner, R. 1977. The origins of capitalist development: a critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism. New Left Review 104: 25–92.Google Scholar
Byres, T. 2006. Differentiation of the peasantry under feudalism and the transition to capitalism. Journal of Agrarian Change 6: 17–68.Google Scholar
Callinicos, A. 2014. Deciphering Capital. London: Bookmarks.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2000. Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DiQuattro, A. 2007. The labor theory of value and simple commodity production. Science and Society 71: 455–483.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 2000. Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ellerman, D. 2007. On the role of capital in ‘capitalist’ and in labor-managed firms. Review of Radical Political Economics 39: 5–26.Google Scholar
Fine, B. and Saad-Filho, M.. 2004. Marx's Capital. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. 2010. A Companion to Marx's Capital. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J. E.. 1975. The Political Economy of Marx. London: Longman Publishers.Google Scholar
Jossa, B. 2012. Cooperative firms as a new mode of production. Review of Political Economy 24: 399–416.Google Scholar
Lebowitz, M. 2010. The Socialist Alternative. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, E. 1974. An Introduction to Marxist Economic Theory. London: Pathfinder Press.Google Scholar
Marglin, S. 1974. What do bosses do?' Review of Radical Political Economics 6: 60–112.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1969. Theories of Surplus Value, Volume 1. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1972. Theories of Surplus Value, Volume 3. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1973. Grundrisse. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1976. Capital, Volume 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1981. Capital, Volume 3. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F.. 1962. Werke, Volume 23. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F.. 1988. Collected Works, Volume 30. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F.. 1989. Collected Works, Volume 32. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F.. 1994. Collected Works, Volume 34. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F.. 2002. The Communist Manifesto, ed. Stedman-Jones, G.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Murray, P. 2004. The social and material transformation of production by capital. In The Constitution of Capital, ed. Bellofiore, R. and Taylor, N.. New York, NY: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, S. 2008. Protoindustrialization. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (2nd edn), ed. Durlauf, S. and Blume, E.. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Post, C. 2011. The American Road to Capitalism. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Post, C. 2013. Capitalism, laws of motion and social relations of production. Historical Materialism 21: 71–91.Google Scholar
Rajan, R. and Zingales, L.. 2001. The firm as a dedicated hierarchy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 805–851.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. 1982. A General Theory of Exploitation and Class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. 1988. Free to Lose. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. 1996. Egalitarian Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schweickart, D. 1996. Against Capitalism. London: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schweickart, D. 2011. After Capitalism (2nd edn). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Skillman, G. 1996. Marxian value theory and the labor-labor power distinction. Science and Society 60: 427–451.Google Scholar
Skillman, G. 1999. Marx's value-theoretic account of capitalist exploitation: non sequitur or tautology? Science and Society 63: 362–372.Google Scholar
Skillman, G. 2007. Value theory vs. historical analysis in Marx's account of capitalist exploitation. Science and Society 71: 203–226.Google Scholar
Sweezy, P. 1942. The Theory of Capitalist Development. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Vanek, J. 1970. The General Theory of the Labor-Managed Economies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, A. 1996. Exploitation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, R. P. 1985. Understanding Marx. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, E. M. 1999. The Origin of Capitalism. London: Verson.Google Scholar
Wood, E. M. 2002. The question of market dependence. Journal of Agrarian Change 2: 50–87.Google Scholar