Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:35:27.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ARE ETHICISTS ANY MORE LIKELY TO PAY THEIR REGISTRATION FEES AT PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2013

Eric Schwitzgebel
Eric Schwitzgebel*
Affiliation:
University of California at Riverside, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lists of paid registrants at Pacific Division meetings of the American Philosophical Association from 2006–2008 were compared with lists of people appearing as presenters, commentators or chairs on the meeting programme those same years. These were years in which fee payment depended primarily on an honour system rather than on enforcement. Seventy-four per cent of ethicist participants and 76% of non-ethicist participants appear to have paid their meeting registration fees: not a statistically significant difference. This finding of no difference survives scrutiny for several possible confounds. Thus, professional ethicists seem no less likely to free-ride in this context than do philosophers not specializing in ethics. These data fit with other recent findings suggesting that on average professional ethicists behave no morally better than do professors not specializing in ethics.

Type
Articles
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , November 2013 , pp. 371 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bauman, Y. and Rose, E.. 2011. Selection or indoctrination: why do economics students donate less than the rest? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 79: 318–327.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R. and Irons, M. D.. 1991. Are economists different, and if so, why? Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, B. and Schultze, G. G.. 2000. Does economics make citizens corrupt? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 43: 101–113.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T. and Regan, D. T.. 1993. Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 159–171.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. and Meier, S.. 2003. Are political economists selfish and indoctrinated? Evidence from a natural experiment. Economic Inquiry 41: 448–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. 2012. The Righteous Mind. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1998 [1785]. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, transl. M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laband, D. N. and Beil, R. O.. 1999. Are economists more selfish than other ‘social’ scientists? Public Choice 100: 85–101.Google Scholar
Marwell, G. and Ames, R. E.. 1981. Economists free ride, does anyone else? Journal of Public Economics 15: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rust, J. and Schwitzgebel, E. forthcoming. The moral behavior of ethicists and the power of reason. In Advances in Experimental Moral Psychology, ed. Sarkissian, H. and Wright, J.. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, E. 2009. Do ethicists steal more books? Philosophical Psychology 22: 711–725.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, E. and Rust, J.. 2009. The moral behaviour of ethicists: peer opinion. Mind 118: 1043–1059.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, E. and Rust, J.. 2010. Do ethicists and political philosophers vote more often than other philosophers? Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1: 189–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwitzgebel, E. and Rust, J.. forthcoming. The moral behavior of ethics professors: relationships among self-reported behavior, expressed normative attitude, and directly observed behavior. Philosophical Psychology.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, E., Rust, J., Huang, L. T., Moore, A. T. and Coates, J.. 2012. Ethicists’ courtesy at philosophy conferences. Philosophical Psychology 25: 331–340.Google Scholar
Selten, R. and Ockenfels, A.. 1998. An experimental solidarity game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 34: 517–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1907 [1874]. The Methods of Ethics, 7th edn. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1975/2002. Animal liberation, 3rd edn. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Yezer, A. M., Goldfarb, R. S. and Poppen, P. J.. 1996. Does studying economics discourage cooperation? Watch what we do, not what we say or how we play. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 177–186.Google Scholar