Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:30:21.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weintraub's Aims: A Brief Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Alexander Rosenberg
Alexander Rosenberg
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Weintraub is not really interested in whether economics is “science” or not. “Economists are not so unsophisticated as to think that calling economics a ‘science’ says anything about what economists do or should do” (1987, p. 140). But can it really be a matter of indifference to him whether the subject has the character of chemistry as opposed to literary criticism?

Type
Discussions
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , April 1987 , pp. 143 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

McCloskey, D. N. 1985. The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. 1986. “Lakatosian Consolations for Economics.” Economics and Philosophy 2:127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1985. General Equilibrium Analysis: Studies in Appraisal. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1987. “Rosenberg's ‘Lakatosian Consolations for Economists’: Comment.” Economics and Philosophy 3:139–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar