Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-2z2hb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-08T15:16:04.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PRIORITY OR SUFFICIENCY …OR BOTH?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2005

CAMPBELL BROWN
CAMPBELL BROWN
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Prioritarianism is the view that we ought to give priority to benefiting those who are worse off. Sufficientism, on the other hand, is the view that we ought to give priority to benefiting those who are not sufficiently well off. This paper concerns the relative merits of these two views; in particular, it examines an argument advanced by Roger Crisp to the effect that sufficientism is the superior of the two. My aim is to show that Crisp's argument is unsound. While I concede his objections against the particular prioritarian views that he considers, I propose a different version of prioritarianism that is invulnerable to those objections.

Type
Essay
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , October 2005 , pp. 199 - 220
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable