Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:13:24.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Life as a Trust Game: a comment on The Option Value of Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2021

Gregory Ponthiere Open the ORCID record for Gregory Ponthiere [Opens in a new window]
Gregory Ponthiere*
Affiliation:
UCLouvain, Hoover Chair in Economic and Social Ethics, 3 Place Montesquieu, 1348Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to Burri (2020), a major reason why suicide is often irrational lies in the option value of life. Remaining alive is valuable because this allows for a larger menu of options, and the possibility of committing suicide in the future adds further value to the act of remaining alive now. In this note, I represent life as a trust game played by two selves – the young self and the old self – and I argue that the possibility to commit suicide in the future can encourage committing suicide now, against what the theory of the option value of life predicts.

Keywords

value of lifesuicideoption valuetrust gamemultiple selves
Type
Reply
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , July 2022 , pp. 300 - 308
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J. and McCabe, K. 1995. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 10, 122–142.10.1006/game.1995.1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burri, S. 2020. The option value of life. Economics and Philosophy. doi: 10.1017/S0266267120000061.Google Scholar
Diamond, P. and Köszegi, B. 2003. Quasi-hyperbolic discounting and retirement. Journal of Public Economics 87, 1839–1872.10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00041-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A. and Pindyck, R. 1994. Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400830176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershfield, H., Goldstein, D., Sharpe, W., Fox, J., Yeykelis, L., Carstensen, L. and Bailenson, J. 2011. Increasing saving behavior through age-progressed renderings of the future self. Journal of Marketing Research 48, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laibson, D. 1997. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 443–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. 1971. Personal identity. Philosophical Review 80, 3–27.10.2307/2184309CrossRefGoogle Scholar