Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:55:39.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John Stuart Mill's Famous Distinction Between Production and Distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Vardaman R. Smith
Vardaman R. Smith
Affiliation:
James Madison University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the final sentence of the "Preliminary Remarks" to the Principles of Political Economy (1848), John Stuart Mill declares

The laws of Production and Distribution, and some of the practical consequences deducible from them, are the subject of the following treatise. (1848, p. 21)

It is almost two hundred pages before Mill asserts that

The laws and conditions of the Production of wealth partake of the character of physical truths. There is nothing optional or arbitrary in them. … It is not so with the Distribution of wealth. That is a matter of human institution solely. (1848, p. 199)

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , October 1985 , pp. 267 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ayer, Alfred J. 1936. Language, Truth, and Logic. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 1962. Economic Theory in Retrospect. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
Dobbs, Maurice. 1973. Theories of Value and Distribution since Adam Smith. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M. 1981. “John Stuart Mill's Philosophy of Economics.” Philosophy of Science 48:363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. 1981. “J. S. Mill and the Inductivist Critics of Political Economy.” Unpublished paper presented at the History of Economics Society Annual Meetings, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Hollis, Martin, and Nell, Edward. 1975. Rational Economic Man. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1963. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 16 vols; Vols. 7–8: A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1976. Principles of Political Economy. London: John W. Parker, West Strand, 1848; reprinted, Fairfield, N.J.: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1974. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyor, 1844; reprinted Clifton, N.J.: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1957. Autobiography. New York: Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1865. Auguste Comte and Positivism. London: Trubner.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Pedro. 1976. The New Political Economy of John Stuart Mill. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Vardaman R. 1984. “Marx's Social Ontology, His Critical Method and Contemporary Social Economics.” Review of Social Economy 92: 143–169.Google Scholar
Sowell, Thomas. 1974. Classical Economics Reconsidered. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Whitaker, J. K. 1975. “John Stuart Mill's Methodology.” Journal of Political Economy 83: 1033–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar