Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T09:03:24.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distributive Considerations in Smith's Conception of Economic Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Amos Witztum
Amos Witztum
Affiliation:
London Guildhall University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In spite of the numerous occasions on which Adam Smith expresses his reservations regarding the morality of commercial societies, there seems to be an agreement that he believed such systems to be fundamentally just. To some, this is so because they attribute to Smith a concept of justice which is narrowly confined to the ‘right to have [one's] body free from injury, and [one's] liberty free from infringement’ (Lectures on Jurisprudence, p. 401). In a world where people have an interest in the fortune of others regardless of how selfish their motives for action might be, injuring someone else's body or restricting someone else's liberty is unlikely to be the behavioural norm.

To others, natural liberty in the sphere of economic activity is just not only because individuals behind the system naturally comply with justice in its commutative sense, but also because the system itself generates justice in the distributive sense. Such arguments are based on either the working of the invisible hand — which produces the ‘same distribution of the necessities of life, which would have been made, had the earth been divided into equal portions among all its inhabitants …’ (TMS, p. 185) — or on the approval of the ‘impartial spectator’ of the distribution which is associated with the natural price (Young, 1986).

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , October 1997 , pp. 241 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, . 1953. Nicomachean Ethis. Trans. Thomson, J. A. K.. Allen & UnwinGoogle Scholar
Buckle, S. 1991. Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume. Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Campbell, T. D. 1971. Adam Smith's Science of Morals. Allen and UnwinGoogle Scholar
Cropsey, J. 1975. ‘Adam Smith and political philosophy’. In Essays on Adam Smith. Skinner, A. S. and Wilson, T. (eds.). Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, K. 1981. The Science of a Legislator. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hont, I. and Ignatieff, M.. 1983. ‘Needs and justice in the Wealth of Nations: an introductory essay’. In Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economcy in the Scottish Enlightnment. Hont, I and Ignatieff, M. (eds.). Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, J. 1994. ‘Adam Smith on justice and distribution in commercial societies’. Scottish Journal of Political Economy. Vol 41:299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, A. S. 1979. A System of Social Science, Paper Relating to Adam Smith. Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. 1976. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Raphael, and Macfie, (eds.). Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. 1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Campbell, Skinner and Todd, (eds.). Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. 1978. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Meek, Raphael and Stein, (eds.). Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Tully, J. 1980. A Discourse on Property. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, J. 1927. ‘Adam Smith and laissez-faire’. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werhane, P. H. 1991. Adam Smith and His Legacy for Modern Capitalism. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Young, J. 1986. ‘The impartial spectator and natural jurisprudence: an interpretation of Adam Smith's Theory of the Natural Price’. History of Political Economy 18:365–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar