Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:05:51.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TESTING FOR UNIT ROOTS IN THE PRESENCE OF A POSSIBLE BREAK IN TREND AND NONSTATIONARY VOLATILITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Giuseppe Cavaliere ,
David I. Harvey ,
Stephen J. Leybourne  and
A.M. Robert Taylor
Giuseppe Cavaliere
Affiliation:
University of Bologna
David I. Harvey*
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Stephen J. Leybourne
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
A.M. Robert Taylor
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
*
*Address correspondence to David Harvey, School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We analyze the impact of nonstationary volatility on the break fraction estimator and associated trend break unit root tests of Harris, Harvey, Leybourne, and Taylor (2009) (HHLT). We show that although HHLT’s break fraction estimator retains the same large-sample properties as demonstrated by HHLT for homoskedastic shocks, the limiting null distributions of unit root statistics based around this estimator are not pivotal under nonstationary volatility. A solution to the identified inference problem, which does not require the practitioner to specify a parametric model for volatility, is provided using the wild bootstrap and is shown to perform well in practice.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 27 , Issue 5: SPECIAL ISSUE ON BOOTSTRAP AND NUMERICAL METHODS IN TIME SERIES , October 2011 , pp. 957 - 991
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, D.W.K. (1993) Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica 61, 821–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D.W.K. & Buchinsky, M. (2001) Evaluation of a three-step method for choosing the number of bootstrap repetitions. Journal of Econometrics 103, 345–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, J. (1994) Least squares estimation of a shift in a linear process. Journal of Time Series Analysis 15, 453–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A., Lumsdaine, R., & Stock, J. (1992) Recursive and sequential tests of the unit root and trend break hypotheses: Theory and international evidence. Journal of Business and Economics Statistics 10, 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, K.N. (1974) Consistent autoregressive spectral estimates. Annals of Statistics 2, 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busetti, F. & Taylor, A.M.R. (2003) Testing against stochastic trend in the presence of variance shifts. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 21, 510–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaliere, G., Harvey, D.I., Leybourne, S.J., & Taylor, A.M.R. (2009) Testing for Unit Roots in the Presence of a Possible Break in Trend and Non-stationary Volatility. Granger Centre Discussion paper 09/05, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaliere, G. & Taylor, A.M.R. (2007) Testing for unit roots in time series models with non-stationary volatility. Journal of Econometrics 140, 919–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaliere, G. & Taylor, A.M.R. (2008) Bootstrap unit root tests for time series with non-stationary volatility. Econometric Theory 24, 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Y. & Park, Y.J. (2003) A sieve bootstrap for the test of a unit root. Journal of Time Series Analysis 24, 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. (1994) Stochastic Limit Theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T.J. & Stock, J.H. (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64, 813–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, S. & Kilian, L. (2004) Bootstrapping autoregressions with conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form. Journal of Econometrics 123, 89–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, S. & Kilian, L. (2007) Asymptotic and bootstrap inference for AR(∞) processes with conditional heteroskedasticity. Econometric Reviews 26, 609–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B.E. (1996) Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica 64, 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D., Harvey, D.I., Leybourne, S.J., & Taylor, A.M.R. (2009) Testing for a unit root in the presence of a possible break in trend. Econometric Theory 25, 1545–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D. & Perron, P. (2009) Unit root tests allowing for a break in the trend function at an unknown time under both the null and alternative hypotheses. Journal of Econometrics 148, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, T.H., Leybourne, S., & Newbold, P. (2002) Unit root tests with a break in innovation variance. Journal of Econometrics 109, 365–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, R.Y. (1988) Bootstrap procedures under some non i.i.d. models. Annals of Statistics 16, 1696–1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mammen, E. (1993) Bootstrap and wild bootstrap for high dimensional linear models. Annals of Statistics 21, 255–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, S. & Perron, P. (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69, 1519–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, L.C., Kuan, C.-M. & Newbold, P. (1995) Spurious break. Econometric Theory 11, 736–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. (1989) The Great Crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57, 1361–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. (1997) Further evidence of breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables. Journal of Econometrics 80, 355–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. & Qu, Z. (2007) A simple modification to improve the finite sample properties of Ng and Perron’s unit root tests. Economics Letters 94, 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. & Rodríguez, G. (2003) GLS detrending, efficient unit root tests and structural change. Journal of Econometrics 115, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. & Zhu, X. (2005) Structural breaks with deterministic and stochastic trends. Journal of Econometrics 129, 65–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensier, M. & van Dijk, D. (2004) Testing for volatility changes in U.S. macroeconomic time series. Review of Economics & Statistics 86, 833–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J.H. & Watson, M.W. (1996) Evidence on structural instability in macroeconomic time series relations. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 14, 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J.H. & Watson, M.W. (1999) A comparison of linear and nonlinear univariate models for forecasting macroeconomic time series. In Engle, R.F. & White, H. (eds.), Cointegration, Causality and Forecasting: A Festschrift in Honour of Clive W.J. Granger, pp. 1–44. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stock, J. & Watson, M.W. (2005) Implications of Dynamic factor Analysis for VAR Models. NBER Working paper 11467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zivot, E. & Andrews, D.W.K. (1992) Further evidence on the Great Crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 10, 251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar