Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:18:49.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TESTING FOR TREND

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2007

Fabio Busetti  and
Andrew Harvey
Fabio Busetti
Affiliation:
Bank of Italy
Andrew Harvey
Affiliation:
Cambridge University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper examines various tests for assessing whether a time series model requires a slope component. We first consider the simple t-test on the mean of first differences and show that it achieves high power against the alternative hypothesis of a stochastic nonstationary slope and also against a purely deterministic slope. The test may be modified, parametrically or nonparametrically, to deal with serial correlation. Using both local limiting power arguments and finite-sample Monte Carlo results, we compare the t-test with the nonparametric tests of Vogelsang (1998, Econometrica 66, 123–148) and with a modified stationarity test. Overall the t-test seems a good choice, particularly if it is implemented by fitting a parametric model to the data. When standardized by the square root of the sample size, the simple t-statistic, with no correction for serial correlation, has a limiting distribution if the slope is stochastic. We investigate whether it is a viable test for the null hypothesis of a stochastic slope and conclude that its value may be limited by an inability to reject a small deterministic slope.The second author thanks the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) for support as part of a project on Dynamic Common Factor Models for Regional Time Series, grant L138 25 1008. Support from the Bank of Italy is also gratefully acknowledged. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the meeting on Frontiers in Time Series held in Olbia, Italy, in June 2005 and at the NSF/NBER Time Series conference in Heidelberg, Germany, in September 2005; we are grateful to several participants for helpful comments. We also thank Peter Phillips, Robert Taylor, Jesus Gonzalo, and a number of other participants at the Unit Root and Co-integration Testing meeting in Faro, Portugal, for helpful comments. We are grateful to Paulo Rodrigues and two referees for their comments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 72 - 87
Copyright
© 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, D.W.K. (1991) Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation. Econometrica 59, 817–858.Google Scholar
Bailey, R.W. & A.M.R. Taylor (2002) An optimal test against a random walk component in a non-orthogonal unobserved components model. Econometrics Journal 5, 520–532.Google Scholar
Bierens, H.J. (2001) Complex unit roots and business cycles: Are they real? Econometric Theory 17, 962–983.Google Scholar
Bunzel, H. & T.J. Vogelsang (2005) Powerful trend function tests that are robust to strong serial correlation, with an application to the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 23, 381–394.Google Scholar
Busetti, F. & A.C. Harvey (2002) Testing for Drift in a Time Series. DAE Working paper 0237, University of Cambridge.
Canjels, W. & M.W. Watson (1997) Estimating deterministic trends in the presence of serially correlated errors. Review of Economics and Statistics 79, 184–200.Google Scholar
Harvey, A.C. (2001) Trend analysis. In D.R. Brillinger (ed.), Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, vol. 4, pp. 2243–2257. Wiley.
Jones, P.D., M. New, D.E. Parker, S. Martin, & I.G. Rigor (1999) Surface air temperature and its changes over the past 150 years. Reviews of Geophysics 37, 173–199.Google Scholar
Kim, T., S. Pfaffenzeller, T. Rayner, & P. Newbold (2003) Testing for linear trend with application to relative primary commodity prices. Journal of Time Series Analysis 24, 539–552.Google Scholar
Koopman, S.J., A.C. Harvey, J.A. Doornik, & N. Shephard (2000) STAMP 6.0, Structural Time Series Analyser, Modeller and Predictor. Timberlake Consultants.
Kwiatkowski, D., P.C.B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, & Y. Shin (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics 44, 159–178.Google Scholar
Nyblom, J. (1989) Testing for the constancy of parameters over time. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84, 223–230.Google Scholar
Nyblom, J. & T. Mäkeläinen (1983) Comparison of tests for the presence of random walk coefficients in a simple linear model. Journal of the American Statistical Association 78, 856–864.Google Scholar
Parker, D.E., C.K. Folland, & M. Jackson (1995) Marine surface temperature: Observed variations and data requirements. Climatic Change 31, 559–600.Google Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. & P. Perron (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75, 335–346.Google Scholar
Stock, J.H. (1994) Unit roots, structural breaks and trends. In R.F. Engle & D.L. McFadden (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 4, pp. 2739–2840. North-Holland.
Sun, H. & S.G. Pantula (1999) Testing for trends in correlated data. Statistics and Probability Letters 41, 87–95.Google Scholar
Visser, H. & J. Molenaar (1995) Trend estimation and regression analysis in climatological time series: An application of structural time series models and the Kalman filter. Journal of Climate 8, 969–979.Google Scholar
Vogelsang, T.J. (1998) Trend function hypothesis testing in the presence of serial correlation. Econometrica 66, 123–148.Google Scholar
Zambrano, E. & T.J. Vogelsang (2000) A simple test of the law of demand for the United States. Econometrica 68, 1013–1022.Google Scholar