Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T07:59:16.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

OPTIMAL VERSUS ROBUST INFERENCE IN NEARLY INTEGRATED NON-GAUSSIAN MODELS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2004

Samuel B. Thompson
Samuel B. Thompson
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Elliott, Rothenberg, and Stock (1996, Econometrica 64, 813–836) derive a class of point-optimal unit root tests in a time series model with Gaussian errors. Other authors have proposed “robust” tests that are not optimal for any model but perform well when the error distribution has thick tails. I derive a class of point-optimal tests for models with non-Gaussian errors. When the true error distribution is known and has thick tails, the point-optimal tests are generally more powerful than the tests of Elliott et al. (1996) and also than the robust tests. However, when the true error distribution is unknown and asymmetric, the point-optimal tests can behave very badly. Thus there is a trade-off between robustness to unknown error distributions and optimality with respect to the trend coefficients.This paper could not have been written without the encouragement of Thomas Rothenberg. This is based on my dissertation, which he supervised. I also thank Don Andrews, Jack Porter, Jim Stock, and seminar participants at the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Toronto, the University of Montreal, Princeton University, and the meetings of the Econometric Society in UCLA. Comments of three anonymous referees greatly improved the exposition of the paper. I owe special thanks to Gary Chamberlain for helping me to understand these results.

Type
Research Article
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 23 - 55
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chan, N.H. & C.Z. Wei (1987) Asymptotic inference for nearly nonstationary AR(1) processes. Annals of Statistics 15, 1050–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, J.M. & M.L. King (1991) Optimal invariant tests for the autocorrelation coefficient in linear regressions with stationary or nonstationary AR(1) errors. Journal of Econometrics 47, 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G., T. Rothenberg, & J.H. Stock (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64, 813–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G. & J.H. Stock (2001) Confidence intervals for autoregressive coefficients near one. Journal of Econometrics 103, 155–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampel, F.R., E.M. Ronchetti, P.J. Rousseeuw, & W.A. Stahel (1986) Robust statistics: The approach based on influence functions. Wiley.
Hansen, B.E. (1999) The grid bootstrap and the autoregressive model. Review of Economics and Statistics 81, 594–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, M.N. & R.W. Koenker (1997) Robust rank tests of the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 65, 133–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herce, M.A. (1966) Asymptotic theory of LAD estimation in a unit root process with finite variance errors. Econometric Theory 12, 129–153.Google Scholar
Hjort, H.L. & D. Pollard (1993) Asymptotics for Minimizers of Convex Processes. Preprints, Department of Statistics, Yale University.
Hoek, H., A. Lucas, & H.K. van Dijk (1995) Classical and Bayesian aspects of robust unit root inference. Journal of Econometrics 69, 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, K.L. (1998) Numerical Methods in Economics. MIT Press.
Lehmann, E.L. (1959) Testing Statistical Hypotheses. Wiley.
Lucas, A. (1995) Unit root tests based on m estimators. Econometric Theory 11, 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P.C.B. (1987) Toward a unified asymptotic theory for autoregression. Biometrika 74 535–547.CrossRef
Phillips, P.C.B. (1988) Regression theory for near-integrated time series. Econometrica 56, 1021–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, D. (1985) New ways to prove central limit theorems. Econometric Theory 1, 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, D. (1991) Asymptotics for least absolute deviation regression estimators. Econometric Theory 7, 186–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg, T.J. (1984) Approximating the distributions of econometric estimators and test statistics. In Z. Griliches & M. Intriligator (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 2. North-Holland.
Rothenberg, T.J. & J.H. Stock (1997) Inference in a nearly integrated autoregressive model with nonnormal innovations. Journal of Econometrics 80, 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, D.W. & B.S. So (1999) Unit root tests based on adaptive maximum likelihood estimation. Econometric Theory 15, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J.H. (1991) Confidence intervals for the largest autoregressive root in U.S. macroeconomic time series. Journal of Monetary Economics 28, 435–459.Google Scholar
Thompson, S.B. (2001) Robust Confidence Intervals for Autoregressive Coefficients near One. Working paper, Harvard University.
Thompson, S.B. (2004) Robust tests of the unit root hypothesis should not be ‘modified.’ Econometric Theory.
van der Vaart, A.W. & J.A. Wellner (1996) Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes. Springer-Verlag.
Xiao, Z. (2001) Likelihood-based inference in trending time series with a root near unity. Econometric Theory 17, 1082–1112.Google Scholar