Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:45:16.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NOTE ON THE POOLING OF INDIVIDUAL PANIC UNIT ROOT TESTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

Joakim Westerlund  and
Rolf Larsson
Joakim Westerlund*
Affiliation:
University of Gothenburg
Rolf Larsson
Affiliation:
Uppsala University
*
*Address correspondence to Joakim Westerlund, Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, P.O. Box 640, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the most cited studies in recent years within the field of nonstationary panel data analysis is that of Bai and Ng (2004), in which the authors propose PANIC, a new framework for analyzing the nonstationarity of panels with idiosyncratic and common components. The problem is that the asymptotic validity of PANIC as a platform for constructing pooled panel unit root tests based on averaging is not fully proven. This paper provides the required results, whose usefulness is verified through simulations.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 25 , Issue 6: Newbold Conference Special Issue , December 2009 , pp. 1851 - 1868
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bai, J. (2003) Inferential theory for factor models of large dimensions. Econometrica 71, 135–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, J. & Ng, S. (2004) A panic attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica 72, 1127–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, J. & Ng, S. (2005) A new look at panel stationarity tests and the PPP hypothesis. In Andrews, D.W.K. and Stock, J.H. (eds.), Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breitung, J. & Pesaran, M.H. (2008) Unit roots and cointegration in panels. In Mátyás, L. & Sevestre, P. (eds.), The Econometrics of Panel Data, 3rd ed., pp. 279–322. Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, D.A. & Fuller, W.A. (1979) Distribution of the estimator for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 427–431.Google Scholar
Gengenbach, C., Palm, F.C., & Urbain, J.-P. (2006) Panel cointegration testing in the presence of common factors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 68, 683–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Im, K.S., Peseran, M., & Shin, Y. (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115, 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, R. (1998) Bartlett corrections for unit root tests. Journal of Time Series Analysis 19, 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnus, J.R. (1978) The moments of products of quadratic forms in normal variables. Statistica Neerlandica 32, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerlund, J. (2008) Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics 23, 193–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerlund, J. & Larsson, R. (2008) A Note on the Pooling of Individual PANIC Unit Root Tests: Supplement. Unpublished manuscript. Available at http://www.hgu.gu/item.aspx?id=17810.Google Scholar