Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:36:48.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EMPIRICAL LIKELIHOOD BASED INFERENCE WITH APPLICATIONS TO SOME ECONOMETRIC MODELS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2004

Francesco Bravo
Francesco Bravo
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper uses the concept of dual likelihood to develop some higher order asymptotic theory for the empirical likelihood ratio test for parameters defined implicitly by a set of estimating equations. The resulting theory is likelihood based in the sense that it relies on methods developed for ordinary parametric likelihood models to obtain valid Edgeworth expansions for the maximum dual likelihood estimator and for the dual/empirical likelihood ratio statistic. In particular, the theory relies on certain Bartlett-type identities that can be used to produce a simple proof of the existence of a Bartlett correction for the dual/empirical likelihood ratio. The paper also shows that a bootstrap version of the dual/empirical likelihood ratio achieves the same higher order accuracy as the Bartlett-corrected dual/empirical likelihood ratio.This paper is based on Chapter 2 of my Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Southampton. Partial financial support under E.S.R.C. grant R00429634019 is gratefully acknowledged. I thank my supervisor, Grant Hillier, for many stimulating conversations and Peter Phillips, Andrew Chesher, and Jan Podivisnky for some useful suggestions. In addition, I am very grateful to the co-editor Donald Andrews and two referees for many valuable comments that have improved noticeably the original draft. All remaining errors are my own responsibility.

Type
Research Article
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 231 - 264
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, M. & I. Stegun (1970) Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.
Andrews, D. (2002) Higher-order improvements of a computationally attractive k-step bootstrap for extremum estimators, Econometrica 70, 119–162.Google Scholar
Babu, G. & K. Singh (1984) On one term Edgeworth corrections by Efron's bootstrap. Sankhya A 46, 219–232.Google Scholar
Baggerly, K. (1998) Empirical likelihood as a goodness of fit measure. Biometrika 85, 535–547.Google Scholar
Barndorff-Nielsen, O. & P. Hall (1988) On the level-error after Bartlett adjustment of the likelihood ratio statistic. Biometrika 75, 374–378.Google Scholar
Bartlett, M. (1953) Approximate confidence intervals II: More than one unknown parameter. Biometrika 40, 306–317.Google Scholar
Beran, R. (1988) Prepivoting test statistics: A bootstrap view of asymptotic refinements. Journal of the American Statistical Society 83, 687–697.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, R. & J. Ghosh (1978) On the validity of formal Edgeworth expansion. Annals of Statistics 6, 434–451.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, R. & R. Rao (1976) Normal Approximation and Asymptotic Expansions. Wiley.
Brown, B. & W. Newey (2001) GMM, Efficient Bootstrapping, and Improved Inference. Manuscript, MIT.
Burnside, C. & M. Eichenbaum (1996) Small sample properties of generalized method of moments based Wald tests. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 14, 294–308.Google Scholar
Chandra, T. & J. Ghosh (1979) Valid asymptotic expansions for the likelihood ratio and other perturbed chi-square variables. Sankhya A 41, 22–47.Google Scholar
Chandra, T. & J. Ghosh (1980) Valid asymptotic expansions for the likelihood ratio and other statistics under contiguous alternatives. Sankhya A 42, 170–184.Google Scholar
Chen, S. (1993) On the accuracy of empirical likelihood confidence regions for linear regression model. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 45, 621–637.Google Scholar
Chen, S.X. (1994) Comparing empirical likelihood and bootstrap hypothesis tests. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 51, 277–293.Google Scholar
Chesher, A. & R. Smith (1997) Likelihood ratio specification tests. Econometrica 65, 627–646.Google Scholar
Corcoran, S., A. Davison, & R. Spady (1995) Reliable Inference from Empirical Likelihoods. Technical report, Department of Statistics, Oxford University.
DiCiccio, T., P. Hall, & J. Romano (1991) Empirical likelihood is Bartlett-correctable. Annals of Statistics 19, 1053–1061.Google Scholar
DiCiccio, T. & J. Romano (1989) On adjustments based on the signed root of the empirical likelihood ratio statistic. Biometrika 76, 447–456.Google Scholar
Hall, P. & B. Presnell (1999) Intentionally biased bootstrap methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 61, 143–158.Google Scholar
Hill, G. & A. Davies (1968) Generalized asymptotic expansions of Cornish-Fisher type. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 39, 1264–1273.Google Scholar
Horowitz, J. (2001) The bootstrap. In J. Heckman & E. Leamer (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 5, pp. 3159–3228. North-Holland.
Huber, P. (1973) Robust regression: Asymptotics, conjectures, and Monte Carlo. Annals of Statistics 1, 799–821.Google Scholar
Kitamura, Y. (1997) Empirical likelihood methods with weakly dependent processes. Annals of Statistics 25, 2084–2102.Google Scholar
Kolaczyk, E. (1994) Empirical likelihood for generalized linear models. Statistica Sinica 4, 199–218.Google Scholar
Lazar, N. & P. Mykland (1998) An evaluation of the power and conditionality properties of empirical likelihood. Biometrika 85, 523–534.Google Scholar
Lazar, N. & P. Mykland (1999) Empirical likelihood in the presence of nuisance parameters. Biometrika 86, 203–211.Google Scholar
Muirhead, R. (1982) Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory. Wiley.
Mykland, P. (1994) Bartlett type of identities for martingales. Annals of Statistics 22, 21–38.Google Scholar
Mykland, P. (1995) Dual likelihood. Annals of Statistics 23, 396–421.Google Scholar
Newey, W. (1990) Efficient instrumental variables estimation of nonlinear models. Econometrica 58, 809–837.Google Scholar
Newey, W. & D. McFadden (1994) Large sample estimation hypothesis testing. In R. Engle & D. McFadden (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 4, pp. 2113–2445. North-Holland.
Owen, A. (1988) Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika 36, 237–249.Google Scholar
Owen, A. (1990) Empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions. Annals of Statistics 18, 90–120.Google Scholar
Owen, A. (1991) Empirical likelihood for linear models. Annals of Statistics 19, 1725–1747.Google Scholar
Owen, A. (1992) Empirical Likelihood and Generalized Projection Pursuit. Technical report 393, Department of Statistics, Stanford University.
Owen, A. (2001) Empirical Likelihood. Chapman and Hall.
Peers, H. (1971) Likelihood ratio and associated test criteria. Biometrika 58, 577–587.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, I. (1981) Transformation of an Edgeworth expansion by a sequence of smooth functions. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 8, 207–217.Google Scholar
Zhang, B. (1996) On the accuracy of empirical likelihood confidence intervals for m-functionals. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 6, 311–321.Google Scholar