Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T04:24:34.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DETECTING LACK OF IDENTIFICATION IN GMM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2003

Jonathan H. Wright
Jonathan H. Wright
Affiliation:
Federal Reserve Board
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper proposes a test of the null of underidentification in the nonlinear-in-parameters generalized method of moments model. It can be thought of as a nonlinear analog of the usual linear instrumental variables first-stage F-test. It can be used as a diagnostic to warn a researcher when conventional asymptotic theory is unlikely to work well.I am grateful to Don Andrews, Jon Faust, John Fernald, Jim Stock, and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. I am also grateful to George Tauchen for providing me with the code for generating artificial asset price data. All errors are my sole responsibility.

Type
Research Article
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 322 - 330
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, T.W. & H. Rubin (1949) Estimation of the parameters of a single equation in a complete system of stochastic equations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 20, 46–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, I. & P.C.B. Phillips (1992) Asymptotic and finite sample distribution theory for IV estimators and tests in partially identified structural equations. Journal of Econometrics 51, 113–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cragg, J.G. & S.G. Donald (1993) Testing identifiability and specification in instrumental variable models. Econometric Theory 9, 222–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cragg, J.G. & S.G. Donald (1997) Inferring the rank of a matrix. Journal of Econometrics 76, 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, J.M. (1997) Some impossibility theorems in econometrics with applications to structural and dynamic models. Econometrica 65, 1365–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L.P. (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50, 1029–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L.P., J. Heaton, & A. Yaron (1996) Finite sample properties of some alternative GMM estimators. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 14, 262–280.Google Scholar
Hsiao, C. (1983) “Identification.” In Z. Griliches & M.D. Intriligator (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Kocherlakota, N. (1990) On tests of representative consumer asset pricing models. Journal of Monetary Economics 26, 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staiger, D. & J.H. Stock (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65, 557–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J.H. & J.H. Wright (2000) GMM with weak identification. Econometrica 68, 1055–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauchen, G. (1986) Statistical properties of generalized method of moments estimators of structural parameters obtained from financial market data. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 4, 397–425.Google Scholar
Tauchen, G. & R. Hussey (1991) Quadrature based methods for obtaining approximate solutions to nonlinear asset pricing models. Econometrica 59, 371–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar