Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T18:11:53.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FRISCH'S ECONOMETRIC LABORATORY AND THE RISE OF TRYGVE HAAVELMO'S PROBABILITY APPROACH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2005

Olav Bjerkholt
Olav Bjerkholt
Affiliation:
University of Oslo/Statistics Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper traces Trygve Haavelmo's training and early career as an econometrician from graduation in economics at the University of Oslo in 1933 until his departure for the United States in 1939. The overwhelming influence on Haavelmo in this period was Ragnar Frisch, whose econometric laboratory at the University of Oslo was Haavelmo's workplace and training ground. In the latter part of the period Haavelmo traveled in Europe, mostly within the network of econometricians Frisch had been instrumental in establishing. Haavelmo's work with Frisch, his interaction with other econometricians and statisticians, and his own scholarly work are set out in some detail, allowing assessment to be made of the development of Haavelmo's econometric ideas. Of particular interest is how far his ideas had evolved by 1939. This paper deals with Frisch and his research program in the early 1930s. Haavelmo's activities are narrated by and large chronologically. A sequel to this paper will deal with Haavelmo's scientific activities while in the United States from 1939 to 1944.I have benefited greatly from extensive, generous, and very insightful advice—and prodding—from three anonymous referees on earlier drafts. I am also most grateful for advice and encouragement from the editor. To one of the anonymous referees I also owe the title. I absolve the referees and take full responsibility for all remaining errors and shortcomings. The paper draws on correspondence and documents from the Rockefeller Archive Center, Tarrytown, New York, and the Frisch Correspondence Files at the National Library of Norway and in addition from the Frisch and Haavelmo archives, currently at the Department of Economics, University of Oslo. I am most grateful to professor emeritus Tore S. Thonstad, who has done a great job of organizing the Frisch and Haavelmo archives. I have also benefited from the comprehensive Frisch bibliography prepared by professor emeritus Kåre N. Edvardsen. I thank J.J. Polak for reminiscences, Yngve Willassen for information, E.S. Jansen and J. Kiviet for a push to submit, and Hilde Bojer and Inger Bjerkodden for encouragement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , June 2005 , pp. 491 - 533
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, J. (1989) Autonomy. Oxford Economic Papers 41, 15–34.Google Scholar
Allen, R.G.D. (1939) The assumptions of linear regression. Economica (New Series) 2(6), 191–204.Google Scholar
Andersen, E. & N. Kærgård (2000) Trygve Haavelmo 13. December 1911–28. Juli 1999. Nationaløkonomisk tidsskrift 138, 288–300.Google Scholar
Andvig, J. Chr. (1986) Ragnar Frisch and the Great Depression. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
Bjerkholt, O. (1998) Ragnar Frisch and the foundation of Econometric Society and Econometrica. In S. Strøm (ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, pp. 26–57. Cambridge University Press.
Bjerkholt, O. (2000) A Turning Point in the Development of Norwegian Economics—The Establishment of the University Institute of Economics in 1932. Memorandum 36/2000, Department of Economics, University of Oslo.
Bjerkholt, O. & E. Lie (2003) Business cycle analysis in Norway until the 1950s. In D. Ladiray (ed.), Monographs of Official Statistics. Papers and Proceedings of the Colloquium on the History of Business-Cycle Analysis. European Communities.
Cassels, J.M. (1933) A critical consideration of Professor Pigous's method of deriving demand curves. Economics Journal 43, 575–586.Google Scholar
Chipman, J.S. (1998) The contributions of Ragnar Frisch to economics and econometrics. In S. Strøm (ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, pp. 58–110. Cambridge University Press.
Cowles Commission (1952) Economic Theory and Measurement: A Twenty Year Research Report 1932–1952. Cowles Commission, University of Chicago.
Davis, H.T. & W.F.C. Nelson (1937) The Elements of Statistics, 2nd edition. Principia Press.
Douglas, P.H. (1976) The Cobb-Douglas production function once again: Its history, its testing, and some new empirical values. Journal of Political Economy 84, 903–916.Google Scholar
Epstein, R.J. (1987) A History of Econometrics. North-Holland.
Fox, K.A. (1986) Agricultural economists as world leaders in applied econometrics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68, 381–386.Google Scholar
Fox, K.A. (1989) Agricultural economists in the econometric revolution: Institutional background, literature and leading figures. Oxford Economic Papers 41, 53–70.Google Scholar
Frisch, R. (1926a) Sur un problème d'économie pure. Norsk Matematisk Forenings Skrifter, series 1, no. 16, 1–40.Google Scholar
Frisch, R. (1926b) Sur les semi-invariants et moments employés dans l'étude des distributions statistiques. Skrifter utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo, II. Historisk-Filosofisk Klasse. No. 3.
Frisch, R. (1927) The Analysis of Statistical Time Series. Mimeo.
Frisch, R. (1929) Correlation and scatter in statistical variables. Nordisk Statistisk Tidsskrift 8, 36–102.Google Scholar
Frisch, R. (1930) Marginal and Limitational Productivity. Lectures at Yale University, spring term, 1930. Mimeo.
Frisch, R. (1932a) New Methods of Measuring Marginal Utility. Verlag von J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Frisch, R. (1932b) Einige Punkte einer Preistheorie mit Boden und Arbeit als Produktionsfaktoren. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 3, 62–104.Google Scholar
Frisch, R. (1933a) Pitfalls in the Statistical Construction of Demand and Supply Curves. Veröffentlichungen der Frankfurter Gesellschaft für Konjunkturforschung, Neue Folge Heft 5. Hans Buske Verlag.
Frisch, R. (1933b) Propagation problems and impulse problems in dynamic economics. In Economic Essays in Honour of Gustav Cassel, pp. 171–205. Allen and Unwin.
Frisch, R. (1933c) Monopole—Polypole—La notion de force dans l'economie. Nationaløkonomisk Tidsskrift 71, 241–259.Google Scholar
Frisch, R. (1934a) Statistical Confluence Analysis by Means of Complete Regression Systems. Publication 5, University Institute of Economics, Oslo.
Frisch, R. (1934b) Makrodynamikk for økonomiske systemer, Forelesninger holdt 1933II and 1934I. Mimeo, Oslo, ssss-trykk.
Frisch, R. (1934c) Some problems in economic macrodynamics. Econometrica 1, 189–192.Google Scholar
Frisch, R. (1935) Tidsrekkeanalyse, Forelesninger påbegynt høstsemestret 1934. Mimeo, Institute of Economics, Oslo.
Frisch, R. (1938) Statistical versus Theoretical Relations in Economic Macrodynamics, Memorandum prepared for the Business Cycle Conference at Cambridge, England, July 1938, to discuss Professor J. Tinbergen's publications for the League of Nations. Reprinted in D.F. Hendry & M.S. Morgan, The Foundations of Econometric Analysis, pp. 407–419. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Frisch, R. & T. Haavelmo (1938) Efterspørselen efter melk i Norge. Statsøkonomisk Tidsskrift 52, 1–62.Google Scholar
Frisch, R. & B.D. Mudgett (1931) Statistical correlation and the theory of cluster types. Journal of the American Statistical Association 26, 375–392.Google Scholar
Frisch, R. & F.V. Waugh (1933) Partial time regressions as compared with individual trends. Econometrica 1, 387–401.Google Scholar
Haavelmo, T. (1937) Confluent relations as means of connecting a macrodynamic subsystem with the total system. Econometrica 5, 373–374.Google Scholar
Haavelmo, T. (1938) The method of supplementary confluent relations, illustrated by a study of stock prices. Econometrica 6, 203–218.Google Scholar
Haavelmo, T. (1939a) Indledning til statistikkens teori. Mimeo, Stencilerte Forelæsningsnotater fra Aarhus Universitet Efteraarssemester 1938, Aarhus.
Haavelmo, T. (1939b) A Dynamic Study of Pig Production in Denmark. Publikasjon nr. 4 fra Aarhus Universitets Økonomiske Institut.
Haavelmo, T. (1939c) Efterspørgselen efter flæsk i København. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Teknisk Økonomi 5, 177–216.Google Scholar
Haavelmo, T. (1939d) Om statistisk “testing” av hypoteser i den økonomiske teori. Mimeo, Det Tredje Nordiske Møte for Yngre Økonomer, København, 27–30. mai 1939, Aarhus.
Haavelmo, T. (1939e) Statistical testing of dynamic systems if the series observed are shock cumulants. In Report of Fifth Annual Research Conference on Economics and Statistics at Colorado Springs, July 3–28, 1939, pp. 45–47. Cowles Commission for Research in Economics.
Haavelmo, T. (1940) The inadequacy of testing dynamic theory by comparing theoretical solutions and observed cycles. Econometrica 8, 312–321.Google Scholar
Haavelmo, T. (1941a) The effect of the rate of interest on investment: A note. Review of Economic Statistics 23, 49–52.Google Scholar
Haavelmo, T. (1941b) On the Theory and Measurement of Economic Relations. Mimeo, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Haavelmo, T. (1943) Statistical testing of business cycle theories. Review of Economic Statistics 25, 13–18.Google Scholar
Haavelmo, T. (1944) The probability approach in econometrics. Econometrica 12, supplement, 1–118.Google Scholar
Haavelmo, T. (1945) Multiplier effects of a balanced budget. Econometrica 13, 311–318.Google Scholar
Haberler, G. (1937) Prosperity and Depression: A Theoretical Analysis of Cyclical Movements. League of Nations.
Hendry, D.F. & M.S. Morgan (1989) A re-analysis of confluence analysis. Oxford Economic Papers 41, 35–52.Google Scholar
Hendry, D.F. & M.S. Morgan (1995) The Foundations of Econometric Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Klein, L.R. (1998) Ragnar Frisch's conception of the business cycle. In S. Strøm (ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, pp. 483–498. Cambridge University Press.
Koopmans, T.C. (1935) On Modern Sampling Theory. Lectures delivered at Oslo, autumn 1935. Mimeo.
Koopmans, T.C. (1937) Linear Regression Analysis of Economic Time Series. Publication 20, Netherlands Economic Institute. De Erven Bohn.
Leontief, W. (1929) Ein Versuch zur statistischen Analyse von Angebot und Nachfrage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 30, 1*–53*.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, E. (1966) Statistical Methods of Econometrics. North-Holland.
Mendershausen, H. (1938) On the significance of Professor Douglas' production function. Econometrica 6, 143–153.Google Scholar
Morgan, M.S. (1990) The History of Econometric Ideas. Cambridge University Press.
Pigou, A.C. (1930) The statistical derivation of demand curves. Economic Journal 40, 384–400.Google Scholar
Polak, J.J. (1994) Economic Theory and Financial Policy: The Selected Essays of Jaques J. Polak, vol. I. Edward Elgar.
Qin, D. (1993) The Formation of Econometrics. Clarendon Press.
Reid, C. (1982) Neyman—from Life. Springer-Verlag.
Samuelson, P.A. (1979) Paul Douglas's measurement of production functions and marginal productivities. Journal of Political Economy 87, 923–939.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1933) The common sense of econometrics. Econometrics 1, 5–12.Google Scholar
Slutsky, E. (1915) Sulla teoria del bilancio del consumatore. Giornale degli economisti e rivista di statistica, series 3, 51, 1–26.Google Scholar
Strøm, S. (ed.) (1998) Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium. Cambridge University Press.
Tinbergen, J. (1939) Statistical Testing of Business-Cycle Theories, vols. I and II. League of Nations.
Wald, A. (1939) The fitting of straight lines if both variables are subject to error. In Report of Fifth Annual Research Conference on Economics and Statistics at Colorado Springs, July 3–28, 1939, pp. 25–28. Cowles Commission for Research in Economics.
Waugh, F.V. (1935) The marginal utility of money in the United States from 1917 to 1921 and from 1922 to 1932. Econometrica 3, 376–399.Google Scholar
Westergaard, H. & H.C. Nybølle (1927) Statistikens Teori i Grundrids, G.E.C. Gads Forlag.
Whittaker, E.T. & G.N. Watson (1927) A Course of Modern Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Young, W. (1987) Interpreting Mr Keynes: The IS-LM Enigma. Blackwell.