Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:13:11.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What of the Church in Wales?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Roger Lee Brown
Affiliation:
Vicar of Tongwynlais and Examining Chaplain to the Bishop of Llandaff
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Most clerics of the Church in Wales will be aware that many people on the fringe of Church life will describe themselves as belonging to the Church of England, rather than as members of the Church in Wales. A Welsh hospital chaplain recently issued a circular requesting that Anglican patients entering hospital should describe themselves as members of the Church in Wales rather than of the Church in England. Seventy and more years after the disestablishment of the Church in Wales there is thus confusion in the minds of many about the identity of the Church in Wales. Is it, or is it not, part of the Church of England? But if there is confusion in the minds of some about the identity of the Church in Wales, there is equal confusion about its status. What does it mean to belong to a disestablished Church? What does it mean to be a disestablished Church?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 1993

References

1. ‘God and Caesar’ in Lay Authority ed Willie, A. R. (Cardiff, 1990), p. 118.Google Scholar

2. (1990)2 Ecc. L.J. 110–115.

3. Green, C. A. H., The Constitution of the Church in Wales (London, 1937), p. 279.Google Scholar

4. Evans, A. W. Wade, Papers for Thinking Welshmen (London, 1907), p. 67.Google Scholar

5. Morris, Edwin, The Church in Wales and Nonconformity: Second Visitation Charge (1949), p. 15.Google Scholar

6. Fowell, W. and Dibdin, L. G., The Welsh Disestablishment Bill 1912 (London, 1912), pp. 14fGoogle Scholar: The Welsh Church (Wales) Bill: The Parliamentary Controversy Further Reviewed (London, 1913), pp. 26, 57–59Google Scholar: Downing, S. E., The Church in Wales: Disestablishment and Disendownment under the Welsh Church Act 1914 (London, 1915), pp. 12, 18fGoogle Scholar, 21–23: Green, , Constitution p. 298.Google Scholar

7. In his paper, Self Government Compatible with Establishment and Endowment (Cardiff, 1911)Google Scholar, Green argued that even an established Church could retain its own legislative authority.

8. The Welsh Church (Wales) Bill p. 26.Google Scholar

9. Fowell, and Dibdin, , The Welsh Disestablishment Bill p. 15.Google Scholar

10. Lerry, George, Alfred George Edwards (Oswestry, 1939), p. 32Google Scholar: Owen, E. E., The later Life of Bishop Owen (Llandysul, 1961), p. 231.Google Scholar

11. Edwards, A. G., Memories (London, 1927), pp. 329331Google Scholar: Owen, , Later Life of Bishop Owen p. 231.Google Scholar

12. Owen, , Later Life of Bishop Owen p. 139.Google Scholar For a contemporary reflection, endorsing these statements, see Winston, Jeremy, “The Church of England and the Church in Wales: Two Radically Different Churches”, in Living Authority pp. 179190.Google Scholar

13. The Welsh Church (Wales) Bill p. 61.Google Scholar

14. Ibid, p. 58.

15. Edwards, A. J., Archbishop Green (Llandysul, 1986), pp. 51fGoogle Scholar: Owen, , Later Life of Bishop Owen, pp. 265, 275.Google Scholar

16. Owen, John, A Statement to St. Davids Diocese on the Acceptance of the Welsh Church Temporalitities Act (Carmarthen, 1919), pp. 40f.Google Scholar

17. Bell, G. K. A., Randall Davidson (Oxford, 1952), p. 987.Google Scholar

18. Ibid, pp. 988–989.

19. Edwards, , Memories p. 328.Google Scholar

20. Green, C. A. H., Disestablishment and Disendowment in Wales (London, 1937), p. 13Google Scholar: see also Williamson, E. W., The Church in Wales (London, 1948), pp. 5fGoogle Scholar, for the results of dismemberment.

21. The Governing Body was more concerned by the date of its second and subsequent meetings with the work of re-construction rather than with the actual title of the church. As the title The Church in Wales is used in the Archbishop of Canterbury's licence allowing the creation of the new Province of Wales on 1 April 1920, one may assume that this title had been found acceptable to the Church by this date without further debate or qualification. I am grateful to the Representative Body for permitting me to inspect the early minute book of the Governing Body, and to Mr Glyn Ellis for drawing my attention to the Archbishop's licence.

22. , Green, Disestablishment and Disendownment p. 5.Google Scholar

23. Green, C. A. H., Disestablishment: A Paper to the Llandaff Diocesan Conference (1911), p. 7.Google Scholar

24. Owen, John, An Essay on the Church in Wales and its Convention (1917), pp. 16f.Google Scholar

25. Official Report of the Proceedings of the Convention of the Church in Wales (Cardiff, 1917), pp. 125146.Google Scholar

26. Ibid, p. 127.

27. Ibid, p. 236, cf. Owen, , An Essay. …, p. 17.Google Scholar

28. Report of Convention p. 132.Google Scholar

29. Ibid, pp. 142f, 137,139.

30. Owen, , An Essay. …, p. 18.Google Scholar

31. Ibid, p. 20.

32. Ibid, pp. 20–22.

33. Owen, , Statement on Acceptance p. 51.Google Scholar

34. Owen, , An Essay p. 27.Google Scholar

35. Owen, John, The Principles of the Welsh Disestablishment Bill (Cardiff, 1909), p. 10Google Scholar: and An Address on the Duty and Encouragement of Welsh ChurchmenGoogle Scholar (Carmarthen, 1911), p. 7.

36. Maintaining that the Church in Wales was ‘the Catholic Church in this land’, Morris argued it possessed a supreme pastoral and spiritual oversight through its diocesan bishops. Stating that ‘both the Roman clergy and Nonconformist ministers are, strictly speaking, intruders’ Morris denied their right ‘to be here’ (Morris, Edwin, Primary Visitation Charge (Newport, 1946), pp. 6, 16Google Scholar). He based his argument on the continuation of the parochial system, together with a highly selective reading of the 17th century formularies of the Church of England which he believed were taken over by the Church in Wales at disestablishment ( Morris, Edwin, The Church in Wales and Nonconformity (Newport, 1949), pp. 2, 8fGoogle Scholar). Unfortunately, he failed to apply these matters hermeneutically to the 20th century world, though he acknowledged the difficulty as to the precise position of canon law within the Church in Wales on page 4 of his first visitation charge. Peart-Binns, J. S. (Edwin Morris, Archbishop of Wales (Llandysul, 1990), pp. 81fGoogle Scholar) notes that Morris was speaking against the backcloth of Archbishop Fisher's controversial proposals for church unity.

37. Conybeare, W. J., Essays Ecclesiastical and Social (London, 1855), p. 190.Google Scholar

38. Davies, A. R., What is the Church in Wales (Cardiff, 1977), p. 1.Google Scholar One might argue that the parochial system of the Church in Wales has always been more in name than in actuality. The system, uncompleted in vast areas of Wales even by the 17th century, broke down extensively in the 18th century, due to the poverty of livings causing pluralism and non-residence. If the system was made to work by the mid 19th century it did so at the expense of clergy: the incumbents of the large urban parishes found it almost impossible to cope, while curates were requried to live on an absolute pittance, less even than a collier's wage. The present system of grouped parishes is almost a reversion to an 18th century position, and the rectorial or team ministry parishes may be compared to the Celtic clas churches.

39. Say, David, ‘Towards 2000: Church and State Relations’, (1990) 2 Ecc. L.J. 153155.Google Scholar

40. Garbett, Cyril, The Claims of the Church of England (London, 1947), see especially pp. 182198.Google Scholar

41. cf. Say, , Towards 2000 pp. 153.Google Scholar

42. R. D., Wales and the World: An Essay for Welsh Churchfolk (Newport, 1935), p. 37, and cf. pp. 8 & 46.Google Scholar

43. Edwards, , Memories pp. 315f.Google Scholar

44. Eliot, T. S., quoted by Garbett, The Claims of the Church of England p. 198.Google Scholar