Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:33:16.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Trial of Bishop King (Read v Bishop of Lincoln)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

John A. Newton
John A. Newton
Affiliation:
Honorary Canon of Lincoln Cathedral Associate Lecturer in Church History, Wesley College, Bristol
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The trial of Bishop Edward King (1829–1910) and the judgment which issued from it proved a landmark in the history of the Victorian Church of England. The judgment was also a turning point in the history of the Catholic Revival, and the bitter series of ritual disputes to which it gave rise. Edward Norman categorised the trial as ‘One of the most important, as well as one of the most extraordinary episodes in the religious history of the nineteenth century.’ R. W. Church, Dean of St Paul's, hailed the judgment as ‘The most courageous thing that has come out of Lambeth for the last 200 years.’ Others, inevitably, given the passions roused by the ritualist controversy, took a more jaundiced view; but few serious Church people were indifferent to the result.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ecclesiastical Law Journal , Volume 5 , Issue 25 , July 1999 , pp. 265 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 1999

References

1 Norman, E. R.. Anti-Catholicism in Victorian England (Allen & Unwin. London. 1968). p. 105.Google Scholar

2 Church, Mary (ed). The Life and Letters of Dean Church (1897). p. 421.Google Scholar

3 Elphinstone v purchas (1870) LR 3 A & E 66.Google Scholar Ct of Arches.

4 Hebbert v Purchas (1871) LR 3 PC 605.Google Scholar

5 Privy Council Appeals Act 1832 (2 & 3 Will 4. c 92). s 3.

6 Public Worship Regulation Act 1874 (37 & 38 Vict, c 85). s 7.

7 Ibid, s 9.

8 Ibid, s 9: Allcroft v Lord Bishop of London [1891] AC 666. HL.Google Scholar

9 Martin v Mackonochie (1868) LR 2 A & E 116Google Scholar. Ct of Arches.

10 Martin v Mackonochie (1868) LR 2 PC 365.Google Scholar

11 Martin v Mackonochie (No 2) (1874) LR 4 A & E 279Google Scholar. Ct of Arches.

12 Cited in Read, John Shelton. Glorious Battle: The Cultural Polities of victorian Anti-Catholicism (Tufton Books/Church Union Publications. London. 1998). p. 136.Google Scholar

13 Norman, . Anti-Catholicism. p. 110.Google Scholar

14 Benson, A. C.. Life of Edward White Benson (2 vols. 1899). II. 354.Google Scholar

15 Ex parte Read (1888) 13 PD 221. PC.Google Scholar

16 Cited in Bell, G. K. A.. Randall Davidson. Archbishop of Canterbury (3rd edn)(Oxford University Press. 1952). p. 28.Google Scholar See Bishop of St David's v Lucy (1699) 12 Mod Rep 237.

17 See Bell, . Davidson, p. 132.Google Scholar

18 The six assessors were Temple (London). Stubbs (Oxford). Thorold (Rochester). Wordsworth (Salisbury). Atlay (Hereford) and Browne (Winchester).

19 Read v Bishop of Lincoln (1889) 14 PD 88.Google Scholar

20 Berdmore Compton. A Popular Review of the Judgment of the Archbishop of Canterbury in the Case of the Bishop of Lincoln (1891). p. 13Google Scholar. Compton was a former Vicar of All Saints. Margaret Street.

21 Davidson, R. T. and Benham, W.. Life of A C. Tait (2 vols. London. 1891). II. 424n.Google Scholar

22 Benson, A. C.. Life and Letters of Maggie Benson (London. 1918). pp. 112 113.Google Scholar

23 King, Edward. Ezra and Nehemiah: the examples for priests and laymen in the present movement in the Church of England (Oxford. 1872). p. 15.Google Scholar

24 Read v Bishop ol Lincoln [1891] P 9.Google Scholar

25 Cited in Russell, G. W. E.. Edward King. Sixtieth Bishop of Lincoln (1912). pp. 166–167.Google Scholar

26 Russell, . Edward King. pp. 189 199.Google Scholar

27 Read v Bishop of Lincoln [1892] AC 644. PC.Google Scholar

28 Lincoln Record Office. Larken Deposit III/17.

29 Chadwick, Owen. Edward King;. Bishop of Lincoln 1885–1910 (Lincoln Minster Pamphlets. 2nd series. No.4. 1968). p. 19.Google Scholar