Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:51:58.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re St Mary, Thame

Oxford Consistory Court: Hodge Ch, 28 April 2022 [2022] ECC Oxf 2 Reservation of grave space – principles to be applied

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2023

David Willink*
Affiliation:
Deputy Chancellor of the Dioceses of Salisbury, Saint Albans and Rochester
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Case Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2023

The petitioner applied for a faculty for the reservation of a double grave space. The petitioner, who was 56, had not lived in the parish since 2013. However, she did have strong family connections with both the parish and the churchyard, not least because the remains of her stillborn son rested there. There was only enough space to accommodate further burials for another seven to ten years.

The court reviewed recent cases and identified a non-exhaustive list of principles to be applied. In the present case, the circumstances were sufficiently exceptional to justify a faculty. The petitioner had shown a strong personal and family connection with the parish, the church and the churchyard, and intended to move back to the area. The incumbent, churchwardens and PCC supported the petition. Particular regard was given to the fact the petitioner's stillborn son had lain in the churchyard for more than 30 years, the court considering that ‘a caring, compassionate and Christ-like church must attach great weight to the bond between mother and stillborn child, and must recognise the mother's understandable desire to be buried near to him’.

A faculty would be granted for a period of ten years, with the petitioner having permission to apply for an extension within six months before expiry. [Naomi Gyane]